Reddit
reddit.com › r/pregnant › has anyone ever had a false positive on the down syndrome screening test?
Has anyone ever had a false positive on the down syndrome screening test? : r/pregnant
December 15, 2021 - My younger sister tested positive for Down syndrome until an amniocentesis resulted negative. ... I don't know the details but my husband's mother was told they thought he would have downs and he does not. That was in the 80s so maybe different test ... My god mother had a false positive.
PubMed Central
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › articles › PMC10484377
Relationship between False Positive Screening Results ... - PMC
Checking your browser before accessing pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · Click here if you are not automatically redirected after 5 seconds
NIPT 99/100 T21 hope for false positive
I’m mid 30’s from Ontario too and also had the help of a fertility clinic to become pregnant with our first. My world shattered on June 24 when OB called with high risk screening result for T18. I was 14 weeks and after seeing significant abnormalities and health concerns on the ultrasound we opted not to wait until 16 weeks for amino. False positives are absolutely possible and I held onto that until I knew something was clearly wrong. I opted for a D&C that same week. It has been just over 2 weeks since our loss. It has been so hard but I am starting to see a light at the end of all of this. More on reddit.com
False positive stories
I also have no idea what the Z score is, but my nipt came back 98% ppv for T21, amnio came back negative, I now have a happy healthy 6 month old More on reddit.com
Has anyone ever had a false positive on the down syndrome screening test?
I’m so sorry to hear this. I have no experience with this and I can only imagine what it must be like. I just want to say that It’s okay to feel whatever you’re feeling. Also, If it’s not a false positive, however you decide to proceed is nobody’s business but yours and nobody has a right to judge. More on reddit.com
Chances of a false negative on NIPT
Just wanted to jump in and say that the r/NIPT subreddit is an AMAZING place. I had an NIPT with a positive (it was a true positive) but I learned a lot and had a lot of support in that forum for everything that came next. If your NIPT is negative or « low risk »- your odds of Down’s is very VERY low. These tests are considered gold standard because they err on the side of false positive- they want to make sure they catch EVERY true positive and sometimes then identify those that are not truly positive, but the chance of missing something like Down’s syndrome is 1 in 10,000 or more. It’s extremely accurate. Measurements of a soft marker are just that- completely non-specific and in the setting of a negative NIPT, nothing to worry about. Your doctor can talk to you more about a dilated kidney but if they aren’t worried, you shouldn’t be either. It’s important to remember that there are plenty of very rare diseases that NIPT doesn’t screen for— if that was the only thing they saw that was slightly abnormal, I don’t think there’s too much cause for concern. If your doctor was worried they would have you do an amnio or follow up with a high risk Maternal-Fetal-Medicine doctor for further screenings or tests. Soft markers are useful when there are multiple showing up- but in the setting of NIPT they are rather useless (unless they are signaling for another disease not tested for on NIPT). An Amnio is not a risk-free procedure. If there’s a real reason to be concerned (and your doctor or a genetic counselor) is encouraging you to get one, of course, get one. I had one done because my NIPT showed I was very high risk- and it turned out to be OK. One soft marker with a negative NIPT? Talk with your doctor about your concerns, but that wouldn’t be enough for me to get an amnio unless there were other reasons. Please be reassured by your NIPT results, they are incredibly sensitive and specific. There is a 1 in 10,000 chance that NIPT is wrong, there is a 8:9 chance that the soft marker is wrong (and probably way more than that in the setting of negative NIPT). More on reddit.com
06:39
New York Times Study Finds High Rate of False Positives in Prenatal ...
01:52
Frequently Asked Questions about Down Syndrome Screening Tests ...
04:03
There Are Way too Many False Positives in Prenatal Screenings - ...
03:31
Part 4: Understanding non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results ...
04:23
Meaning of Positive Non-invasive Prenatal Screening Results - YouTube
02:21
False Positives in Prenatal Blood Tests Could Be Driving Women ...
AAMC
aamc.org › news › prenatal-screenings-can-lead-false-positives-heightened-anxiety
Prenatal screenings can lead to false positives, heightened anxiety | AAMC
June 29, 2022 - “It is an extremely accurate test for a couple of conditions, but pregnancy can be affected by hundreds of genetic conditions,” Norton says. “There’s no guarantee of a healthy baby.” · On the other hand, for several extremely rare conditions, the NIPT results produce more false positives than true positives, as the New York Times reported in January.
Ncfamily
ncfamily.org › home › death by uncertainty: false positives in prenatal testing
Death by Uncertainty: False Positives in Prenatal Testing - North Carolina Family Policy Council
January 2, 2025 - The company does not highlight published studies that clearly demonstrate a positive predictor value below 50 percent among low-risk women (e.g., less than 35 years of age). So, for every 10 low-risk pregnant women screened, at least 5 results are expected to be wrong with no risk of Down syndrome. Flipping a coin would be just as accurate. Labs market these screens to pregnant women, portraying them as definitive tests.
Down Syndrome
down-syndrome.org › en-us › library › research-practice › 12 › 2 › wrongful-deaths-rightful-lives-screening-down-syndrome
Wrongful deaths and rightful lives - screening for Down syndrome
September 16, 2008 - Policies leading to increased first-trimester screening (and therefore diagnosis by CVS) [2,3] may substantially increase the numbers of unaffected babies lost (without corresponding reductions in the false positive rate). Many published studies of competing screening technologies model the effects of differing risk cut-offs. Modelling may or may not be representative of performance in practice. For example, the predicted performance of quadruple test screening shown in Figure 3 at a risk cut-off of ≥1 in 300 was an 86% detection rate for a 6.6% false positive rate [22] .
Nucleus
mynucleus.com › blog › nipt-false-positive
NIPT false positive results: Why they occur and what to do next | Nucleus
NIPT is a screening test, which means it only estimates the likelihood that your baby has a certain chromosomal condition. It doesn’t provide a diagnosis. While NIPT is highly accurate for conditions like Down Syndrome (up to 90% accuracy), it’s less precise for rarer chromosomal abnormalities (accuracy between 2 and 30%). When a NIPT result is inaccurate, it can either be classified as a false positive or a false negative:
PubMed Central
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › articles › PMC4187000
Six consecutive false positive cases from cell-free fetal DNA ...
Checking your browser before accessing pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · Click here if you are not automatically redirected after 5 seconds
Onco-Genomics
oncogenomics.com.ng › nipt-false-positive
What is the Chance of a NIPT False Positive ?
December 10, 2025 - A NIPT false positive simply indicates that the screening test picked up a potential abnormality that isn’t present in your baby, requiring confirmation through diagnostic tests. While NIPT is highly accurate, the likelihood of a NIPT false positive can be slightly higher for rarer conditions such as Trisomy 13 (Patau syndrome) and Trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome) compared to Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), especially in low-risk pregnancies.
ScienceDirect
sciencedirect.com › science › article › abs › pii › S0306545601002443
Age related detection and false positive rates when screening for Down's Syndrome in the first trimester using fetal nuchal translucency and maternal serum free βhCG and PAPP-A - ScienceDirect
October 12, 2001 - Screening for Down's Syndrome in ... principles of screening have been reviewed1. Detection rates (sensitivity) of 60% to 75% are quoted for a 5% false positive rate (specificity), and this information is often quoted to women in information leaflets or given verbally during ...
Downs Syndrome Association
downs-syndrome.org.uk › wp-content › uploads › 2020 › 08 › 2020.FactChecker_NIPT.pdf pdf
Fact Checking Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) for Down’s syndrome
chance of your baby having Down’s syndrome. Amniocentesis or CVS are diagnostic tests, so they tell · you if the baby does or does not have Down’s syndrome. NIPT has false negatives and false positives. A recent study in the Netherlands,2 identified 237 babies as having Down’s syndrome.
Parents
parents.com › news › noninvasive-prenatal-tests-often-result-in-false-positives-heres-what-that-means
What to Know About NIPTs and False Positives
August 10, 2023 - According to The New York Times investigation, NIPT tests are thought to be highly accurate in assessing your baby's risk for Down syndrome, one of the first uses of these tests. However, when it comes to rarer genetic abnormalities, there are more possibilities for NIPT false positives.
PubMed Central
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › articles › PMC3932282
A Case of False Negative NIPT for Down Syndrome-Lessons Learned - PMC
The sensitivity and specificity reported by many of companies offering NIPT are based on validation studies of only a few hundred to thousand individuals and have not factored in data obtained in the clinical setting. For this reason, all patients should be counseled prior to testing on the various possible test results as the risk of false positive or false negative results can occur.
PubMed
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › 11702835
Age related detection and false positive rates when ...
Checking your browser before accessing pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · Click here if you are not automatically redirected after 5 seconds