🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/pregnant › has anyone ever had a false positive on the down syndrome screening test?
Has anyone ever had a false positive on the down syndrome screening test? : r/pregnant
December 15, 2021 - My younger sister tested positive for Down syndrome until an amniocentesis resulted negative. ... I don't know the details but my husband's mother was told they thought he would have downs and he does not. That was in the 80s so maybe different test ... My god mother had a false positive.
🌐
PubMed Central
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › articles › PMC10484377
Relationship between False Positive Screening Results ... - PMC
Checking your browser before accessing pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · Click here if you are not automatically redirected after 5 seconds
Discussions

NIPT 99/100 T21 hope for false positive
I’m mid 30’s from Ontario too and also had the help of a fertility clinic to become pregnant with our first. My world shattered on June 24 when OB called with high risk screening result for T18. I was 14 weeks and after seeing significant abnormalities and health concerns on the ultrasound we opted not to wait until 16 weeks for amino. False positives are absolutely possible and I held onto that until I knew something was clearly wrong. I opted for a D&C that same week. It has been just over 2 weeks since our loss. It has been so hard but I am starting to see a light at the end of all of this. More on reddit.com
🌐 r/NIPT
36
15
July 13, 2024
False positive stories
I also have no idea what the Z score is, but my nipt came back 98% ppv for T21, amnio came back negative, I now have a happy healthy 6 month old More on reddit.com
🌐 r/NIPT
81
15
December 9, 2022
Has anyone ever had a false positive on the down syndrome screening test?
I’m so sorry to hear this. I have no experience with this and I can only imagine what it must be like. I just want to say that It’s okay to feel whatever you’re feeling. Also, If it’s not a false positive, however you decide to proceed is nobody’s business but yours and nobody has a right to judge. More on reddit.com
🌐 r/pregnant
110
40
December 15, 2021
Chances of a false negative on NIPT
Just wanted to jump in and say that the r/NIPT subreddit is an AMAZING place. I had an NIPT with a positive (it was a true positive) but I learned a lot and had a lot of support in that forum for everything that came next. If your NIPT is negative or « low risk »- your odds of Down’s is very VERY low. These tests are considered gold standard because they err on the side of false positive- they want to make sure they catch EVERY true positive and sometimes then identify those that are not truly positive, but the chance of missing something like Down’s syndrome is 1 in 10,000 or more. It’s extremely accurate. Measurements of a soft marker are just that- completely non-specific and in the setting of a negative NIPT, nothing to worry about. Your doctor can talk to you more about a dilated kidney but if they aren’t worried, you shouldn’t be either. It’s important to remember that there are plenty of very rare diseases that NIPT doesn’t screen for— if that was the only thing they saw that was slightly abnormal, I don’t think there’s too much cause for concern. If your doctor was worried they would have you do an amnio or follow up with a high risk Maternal-Fetal-Medicine doctor for further screenings or tests. Soft markers are useful when there are multiple showing up- but in the setting of NIPT they are rather useless (unless they are signaling for another disease not tested for on NIPT). An Amnio is not a risk-free procedure. If there’s a real reason to be concerned (and your doctor or a genetic counselor) is encouraging you to get one, of course, get one. I had one done because my NIPT showed I was very high risk- and it turned out to be OK. One soft marker with a negative NIPT? Talk with your doctor about your concerns, but that wouldn’t be enough for me to get an amnio unless there were other reasons. Please be reassured by your NIPT results, they are incredibly sensitive and specific. There is a 1 in 10,000 chance that NIPT is wrong, there is a 8:9 chance that the soft marker is wrong (and probably way more than that in the setting of negative NIPT). More on reddit.com
🌐 r/BabyBumps
18
5
January 23, 2022
🌐
AAMC
aamc.org › news › prenatal-screenings-can-lead-false-positives-heightened-anxiety
Prenatal screenings can lead to false positives, heightened anxiety | AAMC
June 29, 2022 - “It is an extremely accurate test for a couple of conditions, but pregnancy can be affected by hundreds of genetic conditions,” Norton says. “There’s no guarantee of a healthy baby.” · On the other hand, for several extremely rare conditions, the NIPT results produce more false positives than true positives, as the New York Times reported in January.
🌐
Ncfamily
ncfamily.org › home › death by uncertainty: false positives in prenatal testing
Death by Uncertainty: False Positives in Prenatal Testing - North Carolina Family Policy Council
January 2, 2025 - The company does not highlight published studies that clearly demonstrate a positive predictor value below 50 percent among low-risk women (e.g., less than 35 years of age). So, for every 10 low-risk pregnant women screened, at least 5 results are expected to be wrong with no risk of Down syndrome. Flipping a coin would be just as accurate. Labs market these screens to pregnant women, portraying them as definitive tests.
🌐
Down Syndrome
down-syndrome.org › en-us › library › research-practice › 12 › 2 › wrongful-deaths-rightful-lives-screening-down-syndrome
Wrongful deaths and rightful lives - screening for Down syndrome
September 16, 2008 - Policies leading to increased first-trimester screening (and therefore diagnosis by CVS) [2,3] may substantially increase the numbers of unaffected babies lost (without corresponding reductions in the false positive rate). Many published studies of competing screening technologies model the effects of differing risk cut-offs. Modelling may or may not be representative of performance in practice. For example, the predicted performance of quadruple test screening shown in Figure 3 at a risk cut-off of ≥1 in 300 was an 86% detection rate for a 6.6% false positive rate [22] .
🌐
Choice DNA
choicedna.com › home › can nipt test be wrong for down syndrome?
Can NIPT Test Be Wrong for Down Syndrome
October 5, 2023 - In contrast, a NIPT false positive does not necessarily indicate a healthy pregnancy or the chances of a child being free from Down syndrome because false negatives can occasionally occur.
🌐
Nucleus
mynucleus.com › blog › nipt-false-positive
NIPT false positive results: Why they occur and what to do next | Nucleus
NIPT is a screening test, which means it only estimates the likelihood that your baby has a certain chromosomal condition. It doesn’t provide a diagnosis. While NIPT is highly accurate for conditions like Down Syndrome (up to 90% accuracy), it’s less precise for rarer chromosomal abnormalities (accuracy between 2 and 30%). When a NIPT result is inaccurate, it can either be classified as a false positive or a false negative:
🌐
PubMed Central
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › articles › PMC4187000
Six consecutive false positive cases from cell-free fetal DNA ...
Checking your browser before accessing pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · Click here if you are not automatically redirected after 5 seconds
Find elsewhere
🌐
New England Journal of Medicine
nejm.org › doi › full › 10.1056 › NEJM199908123410701
Integrated Screening for Down's Syndrome Based on Tests Performed during the First and Second Trimesters | New England Journal of Medicine
When we used a risk of 1 in 120 or greater as the cutoff to define a positive result on the integrated screening test, the rate of detection of Down's syndrome was 85 percent, with a false positive rate of 0.9 percent.
🌐
Onco-Genomics
oncogenomics.com.ng › nipt-false-positive
What is the Chance of a NIPT False Positive ?
December 10, 2025 - A NIPT false positive simply indicates that the screening test picked up a potential abnormality that isn’t present in your baby, requiring confirmation through diagnostic tests. While NIPT is highly accurate, the likelihood of a NIPT false positive can be slightly higher for rarer conditions such as Trisomy 13 (Patau syndrome) and Trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome) compared to Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), especially in low-risk pregnancies.
🌐
National Catholic Register
ncregister.com › front page › cna › new report exposes drastically high false positives in prenatal testing
New Report Exposes Drastically High False Positives in Prenatal Testing| National Catholic Register
July 9, 2022 - “Even for common conditions, such as Down syndrome, the false positive rate can be as high as nearly 20%," the statement said, citing data from a 2016 review of clinical studies contained in a report by the London-based Nuffield Council on ...
🌐
ScienceDirect
sciencedirect.com › science › article › abs › pii › S0306545601002443
Age related detection and false positive rates when screening for Down's Syndrome in the first trimester using fetal nuchal translucency and maternal serum free βhCG and PAPP-A - ScienceDirect
October 12, 2001 - Screening for Down's Syndrome in ... principles of screening have been reviewed1. Detection rates (sensitivity) of 60% to 75% are quoted for a 5% false positive rate (specificity), and this information is often quoted to women in information leaflets or given verbally during ...
🌐
NYTimes
nytimes.com › 2022 › 01 › 01 › upshot › pregnancy-birth-genetic-testing.html
These Prenatal Tests Are Usually Wrong When Warning of Rare Disorders - The New York Times
January 7, 2022 - At least six percent of the tests include the full panel of microdeletions.Those would be expected to find about eight true positives and between 17 and 134 false ones. Estimates are based on data from two Natera studies: DiGeorge syndrome, ...
🌐
The Seattle Times
seattletimes.com › local news › health › uw experts shed light on false positives in prenatal tests
UW experts shed light on false positives in prenatal tests | The Seattle Times
April 2, 2015 - They analyze small bits of fetal DNA found floating in pregnant women’s blood to test for chromosomal abnormalities. But some women have extra DNA on the chromosomes in question, the researchers found, which bumps up the total count, creating ...
🌐
Downs Syndrome Association
downs-syndrome.org.uk › wp-content › uploads › 2020 › 08 › 2020.FactChecker_NIPT.pdf pdf
Fact Checking Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) for Down’s syndrome
chance of your baby having Down’s syndrome. Amniocentesis or CVS are diagnostic tests, so they tell · you if the baby does or does not have Down’s syndrome. NIPT has false negatives and false positives. A recent study in the Netherlands,2 identified 237 babies as having Down’s syndrome.
🌐
Natural Womanhood
naturalwomanhood.org › home › article archive › nyt reveals that false-positives with prenatal genetic testing are more common than most people realize
NYT reveals that false-positives with prenatal genetic testing are more common than most people realize
January 23, 2025 - What the researchers found was stunning: They estimate that, if you are at high risk, a positive result for Down syndrome is correct 91% of the time and wrong 9% of the time [4]. That means one in ten women who receive a positive result suggesting ...
🌐
Parents
parents.com › news › noninvasive-prenatal-tests-often-result-in-false-positives-heres-what-that-means
What to Know About NIPTs and False Positives
August 10, 2023 - According to The New York Times investigation, NIPT tests are thought to be highly accurate in assessing your baby's risk for Down syndrome, one of the first uses of these tests. However, when it comes to rarer genetic abnormalities, there are more possibilities for NIPT false positives.
🌐
PubMed Central
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › articles › PMC3932282
A Case of False Negative NIPT for Down Syndrome-Lessons Learned - PMC
The sensitivity and specificity reported by many of companies offering NIPT are based on validation studies of only a few hundred to thousand individuals and have not factored in data obtained in the clinical setting. For this reason, all patients should be counseled prior to testing on the various possible test results as the risk of false positive or false negative results can occur.
🌐
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
ajog.org › article › S0002-9378(11)02014-X › fulltext
706: False positive Down syndrome screening in women with sickle cell anemia - American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
January 1, 2012 - The average value for each serum ... false positive serum screening for Down syndrome was 40.0% in patients with sickle cell anemia and 28.1% in the control population, odds ratio, 1.71, ......
🌐
PubMed
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › 11702835
Age related detection and false positive rates when ...
Checking your browser before accessing pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · Click here if you are not automatically redirected after 5 seconds