🌐
Food Packaging Forum
foodpackagingforum.org › home › news articles › alternatives to bpa are mostly not safer, scientists find
Alternatives to BPA are mostly not safer, scientists find | Food Packaging Forum
August 27, 2025 - With the growing awareness of the health concerns of BPA, it has been replaced with other structurally similar bisphenols such as bisphenol S (BPS, CAS 80-09-1), bisphenol F (BPF, CAS 620-92-8), which have a similar functionality and prevent ...
🌐
US EPA
epa.gov › sciencematters › are-bpa-substitutes-any-safer-bpa
Are BPA Substitutes Any Safer Than BPA? | US EPA
December 17, 2025 - The researchers specifically tested ... and young children. The team showed that some of the BPA alternatives were actually more potent than BPA itself in activating the estrogen receptor....
Discussions

New study raises concerns about the safety of BPA-free packaging. Chemicals used to replace bisphenol A (BPA) in food packaging can trigger potentially harmful effects in human ovarian cells. Researchers warn that ‘BPA-free’ does not necessarily mean safe.
Perhaps because many alternatives are simply bpa with slight changes, like bps, bpf, etc... More on reddit.com
🌐 r/science
227
1966
August 27, 2025
How concerned should we be about “BPA-free” food and drink containers?
I just want to say that plastics that are "BPA free" use other compounds that do not have as many robust studies as BPA. A common one used is BPS, which some studies may indicate that it may even be worse than BPA, we just don't know yet. More on reddit.com
🌐 r/ScienceBasedParenting
106
145
August 6, 2022
BPA alternatives as bad (or worse) than BPA.
everything leeches. It is just the way it is. More on reddit.com
🌐 r/CampingGear
34
21
April 24, 2016
TIL Plastics that no longer contain BPA now contain BPS or BPF which may be just as bad or worse for your health.
Yeah, it seems to be a common cycle to replace one thing that's bad for you with something that it isn't known whether or not it's bad for you. Stuff in plastic, artificial sweeteners, the list goes on and on (don't ask me for the list, I made that last part up because I can't think of other things right now). More on reddit.com
🌐 r/todayilearned
73
1181
April 1, 2016
🌐
National Geographic
nationalgeographic.com › home › premium › we got rid of bpa in some products—but are the substitutes any safer?
We got rid of BPA in some products—but are the substitutes any safer? | National Geographic
March 5, 2024 - Walking down any aisle in a supermarket, “BPA-free” labels declare food, water bottles, sippy cups, and other products to be clear of bisphenol A (BPA)—a chemical used in plastic and as a liner in food cans. Serious health concerns linked to BPA prompted manufacturers to synthesize dozens of chemical substitutes that are now incorporated into thousands of products.
🌐
Phys.org
phys.org › news › 2024-11-safe-bpa-alternatives-pose-health.html
Study finds 'safe' BPA alternatives may still pose health risks
November 18, 2024 - A study by Professor José Villalaín of the Miguel Hernández University of Elche (UMH) in Spain, published in the Journal of Xenobiotics, reveals that bisphenol analogs BPF and BPS, used as safer alternatives to BPA, may still pose health risks.
🌐
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
hsph.harvard.edu › home › harmful chemicals removed from products often replaced with something as bad or worse
Harmful chemicals removed from products often replaced with something as bad or worse | Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
November 22, 2024 - Chan School of Public Health. In an opinion piece published December 15, 2016 in The Washington Post, he wrote that BPA may simply have been swapped for BPS, or bisphenol-S, a similar chemical thought to be even more harmful to children’s health.
🌐
Green Choice Lifestyle
greenchoicelifestyle.com › home › the latest: › why bpa-free plastic isn’t safe (+ what to use instead)
Why BPA-Free Plastic Isn’t Safe (+ What to Use Instead)
May 27, 2025 - In many cases, it just means BPA was swapped for something equally concerning, like BPS or BPF. When the pressure to remove BPA (Bisphenol A) hit hard in the early 2000s, thanks to growing evidence linking it to hormone disruption, infertility, ...
🌐
Science
science.org › content › article › bpa-substitutes-may-be-just-bad-popular-consumer-plastic
BPA substitutes may be just as bad as the popular consumer plastic | Science | AAAS
September 13, 2018 - Over the past decade, concerns ... use of the common plastic in many household items. In its place, they've turned to more than 50 "BPA-free" alternatives....
🌐
Toxic Free Choice
toxicfreechoice.com › home › blog › the truth about bpa, bps & “bpa-free” plastics: what you’re not being told
The Truth About BPA, BPS & “BPA-Free” Plastics: What You’re Not Being Told - Toxic Free Choice
August 8, 2025 - When regulators started banning BPA, the plastics industry didn’t switch to safer options. They exploited a loophole. They rolled out chemical cousins like BPS and BPF, slapped on a “BPA-free” label, and kept selling the same risk—just rebranded. 👉 The kicker? These “alternatives” were tested even less than BPA.
🌐
Chemistry World
chemistryworld.com › news › concerns-raised-over-regrettable-bpa-substitutions › 3010871.article
Concerns raised over ‘regrettable’ BPA substitutions | News | Chemistry World
August 6, 2024 - Research indicates chemicals used as alternatives to bisphenol A in polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins aren’t always safer
Find elsewhere
🌐
The Conversation
theconversation.com › bps-a-popular-substitute-for-bpa-in-consumer-products-may-not-be-safer-54211
BPS, a popular substitute for BPA in consumer products, may not be safer
October 3, 2025 - Our work provides important supporting ... ways that could have later impacts on reproductive health. In sum, BPS is not necessarily a safer alternative to BPA....
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/science › new study raises concerns about the safety of bpa-free packaging. chemicals used to replace bisphenol a (bpa) in food packaging can trigger potentially harmful effects in human ovarian cells. researchers warn that ‘bpa-free’ does not necessarily mean safe.
r/science on Reddit: New study raises concerns about the safety of BPA-free packaging. Chemicals used to replace bisphenol A (BPA) in food packaging can trigger potentially harmful effects in human ovarian cells. Researchers warn that ‘BPA-free’ does not necessarily mean safe.
August 27, 2025 - And I argue that in many cases the current materials should not be banned until an alternative is shown as clearly better or overwhelmingly less bad (as in lower body count) - just to prevent expensive industry wide material replacement efforts that don’t do anything for anyone except investors. ... I assume you mean as a food additive? Titanium dioxide has… a lot of applications. ... Yes, but also don’t replace other stuff if the problem is mostly ingestion. ... This is old news. I remember like 5-10 years ago scientists were talking about all the BPA alternatives were just basically the same thing just not outlawed yet.
🌐
NonToxicLab
nontoxiclab.com › home › chemical education › is bpa-free actually safe? (spoiler: not really)
Is BPA-Free Actually Safe? (Spoiler: Not Really) | NonToxicLab
December 28, 2025 - Most BPA-free products replace bisphenol A with BPS, BPF, or BPAF, which research shows disrupt hormones in similar ways. The label tells you one chemical was removed, nothing more.
🌐
Eco Lunch Boxes
ecolunchboxes.com › blogs › news › are-bpa-alternatives-really-safe
Are BPA Alternatives Really Safe?
As consumers have demanded BPA be removed from their products, companies have replaced it with similar chemicals such as Bisphenol-S and Bisphenol-F. Even though these specific chemicals haven’t been as widely studied as BPA, the research ...
🌐
Inverse
inverse.com › health
BPA: Chemicals Used to Replace Toxic Common Plastics Aren’t Safe After All
July 25, 2019 - In 2008, consumers began to ditch the popular Nalgene water bottle over concerns about bisphenol A (BPA), a chemical that could leach from it and cause changes to the body’s hormonal system. The public health concerns were so striking that Nalgene reformulated the plastics in its flagship product.
🌐
Plastic Detox
plasticdetox.org › home › articles › bpa free is not safe
BPA Free Is Not Safe: What Replaces BPA and Why It Matters (2026)
2 weeks ago - But here is what the label does not tell you: the chemical that replaced BPA in that bottle is often just as harmful. Studies show that BPA substitutes like BPS and BPF have the same endocrine disrupting effects as the chemical they replaced.
🌐
National Geographic
nationalgeographic.com › home › science › why 'bpa free' may not mean a plastic product is safe
Is BPA-Free Plastic Safe? Get the Facts. | National Geographic
July 15, 2022 - And opt for glass or steel containers rather than lined aluminum cans whenever possible. For regulators, Rochester says there's no time to waste in making moves away from BPA alternatives.
🌐
EurekAlert!
eurekalert.org › news-releases › 1065261
Study finds 'safe' BPA alternatives pose health risks | EurekAlert!
Bisphenol A (BPA), the main bisphenol, exhibits many unwanted effects. BPA has, currently, been replaced with bisphenol F (BPF) and bisphenol S (BPS) in many applications in the hope that these molecules have a lesser effect on metabolism than BPA.
🌐
Undark Magazine
undark.org › home › news & features › the pros and cons of ‘bpa-free’
'BPA-free' Products Abound, but Are the Alternatives Any Better?
September 30, 2019 - While food and beverage industry heavyweights like General Mills, Campbell’s, and Del Monte don’t acknowledge that BPA may be unsafe, they have responded to consumer demand and are gradually shifting to BPA-free lined cans and products.
🌐
Earth.com
earth.com › home › news › lifestyle news
Was BPA replaced with something just as bad? - Earth.com
October 16, 2020 - Research has shown effects that are very similar to those of BPA. According to the EPA, BPA alternatives may actually be more potent than BPA itself.
🌐
The Filtery
thefiltery.com › home › does “bpa-free” really mean “safe”?
Does "BPA-Free" Really Mean "Safe"? - The Filtery
March 5, 2026 - In fact, early research is showing that some BPA alternatives may be even worse than BPA! These are what we call “regrettable substitutions,” (And unfortunately, it happens all of the time in the world of synthetic chemicals.