Undocumented immigrant in possession
Rights are granted to citizens of a country. This of course there is the concept that they are bestowed by being alive/god - but that’s not really rellevent and just marketing.
But the concept of citizenship carries over each time you make a purchase where you avow that you are not part of an organization that wants to overthrow the government.
Conversely I do not have the right to vote in whoever countries elections whenever I want. I also do not have the right on a states basis to carry wherever I want, but that takes it down another step.
This guy is getting locked up and sent off..
More on reddit.comEverything about this is stupid
Bruen isn't the underpinning of this issue, it's that the Constitution applies to everyone in the country. Otherwise an undocumented immigrant could be made to be a slave if the 13th amendment didn't apply to them.
More on reddit.comMigrant Teen Who Died in U.S. Custody Was Unresponsive for Hours, Report Says
We are murdering people
More on reddit.comAutopsy Offers Jarring New Details About the Death of a 16-Year-Old Guatemalan Boy | Days after he was supposed to be in a children’s shelter, Carlos Gregorio Hernandez Vasquez died of the flu near the toilet in his Border Patrol holding cell.
Jamil Smith:
More on reddit.comCarlos Gregorio Hernandez Vasquez was 16, so he was only supposed to be in a @CBP detention center for 72 hours, tops. He’d been there six days when he died of the flu near the toilet in his holding cell. This happened in May. We’re just learning this now.
From an opinion/order in US v Carbajal-Flores handed down March 8 in the Northern District of Illinois:
Defendant Heriberto Carbajal-Flores ("Carbajal-Flores") is charged with possession of a firearm while illegally or unlawfully in the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5).
...
... [T]he historical record establishes that legislatures categorically disarmed (1) individuals who were not members of the political community and (2) individuals who threatened the social order through their untrustworthy adherence to the rule of law. ... Section 922(g)(5) is facially constitutional.
... [The] historical analogue contained an exception allowing British loyalists to sign loyalty oaths. ... This exception necessarily requires an individualized assessment. ... [T]he individuals who fell within the exception were determined to be non-violent during their individual assessments, permitting them to carry firearms. ...
... Carbajal-Flores has never been convicted of a felony, a violent crime, or a crime involving the use of a weapon. ... Carbajal-Flores has consistently adhered to and fulfilled all the stipulated conditions of his release, is gainfully employed, and has no new arrests or outstanding warrants. ... Thus, this Court finds that, as applied to Carbajal-Flores, Section 922(g)(5) is unconstitutional.
Would the US appeal to the 7th Circuit and risk setting precedent? I'm inclined to think not. Well, they've got some time to think about it.
Rights are granted to citizens of a country. This of course there is the concept that they are bestowed by being alive/god - but that’s not really rellevent and just marketing.
But the concept of citizenship carries over each time you make a purchase where you avow that you are not part of an organization that wants to overthrow the government.
Conversely I do not have the right to vote in whoever countries elections whenever I want. I also do not have the right on a states basis to carry wherever I want, but that takes it down another step.
This guy is getting locked up and sent off..
It is still so dumb that we’re deciding what laws are constitutional based solely on what judges can dig up about legal practices from 250+ years ago.