Chinese-Canadian educator known for geopolitical predictions
Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Jiang_Xueqin
Jiang Xueqin - Wikipedia
2 days ago - Jiang Xueqin (Chinese: 江学勤; pinyin: Jiāng Xuéqín; born 1976), is a Chinese-born Canadian educator and commentator. In the 2000s, he was involved in education reforms in China. Since 2022, he has worked as a teacher at Moonshot Academy high school in Beijing.
Reddit
reddit.com › r/outoftheloop › why have people been talking about professor jiang? who exactly is this guy?
r/OutOfTheLoop on Reddit: Why have people been talking about Professor Jiang? Who exactly is this guy?
March 17, 2026 -
Been seeing A LOT of social media content being poured in about this guy lately. All I can gather at the moment is apparently he predicted that Trump would win the presidency and that the US would go to war or something like that? And recently he did an interview with Piers Morgan as well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QK6hfzFQpxM
Top answer 1 of 10
2886
Answer: He is a Canadian Chinese (high-school) teacher who runs a YouTube channel called Predictive History, where he calls himself Professor Jiang, he is not a professor, does not have a doctorate, and has never taught at university level. Over the past year he has moved away from historical topics and begun commenting on international affairs. Although he had already built up a significant social media following, for some reason he recently went viral and has since appeared in interviews in a wide variety of media. Most notably, some have claimed that his analysis has accurately predicted recent international events. The most common being his prediction that (a) trump would win, (b) he would start a war with Iran, (c) the USA would lose this war. In regard to these (a) was very likely to happen, (b) was less likely but a high probability based upon Israel's stated goals and influence on US policy, as well as Trump's own position on Iran, (c) remains to be seem but was something that many analysts have already said would be the result of any hasty attack on Iran that expected it to fold like past US opponents have. Also important to note is that Jiang claims his analytical techniques are based upon 'psychohistory' a fictional 'field of study' that is a mixture of history, psychology, and political analysis and which was created in Isaac Asimov's Foundation series of science fiction books. He also claims to get his information from a higher power, and has view of historical patterns which might be described as 'conspiratorial', i.e. secretive groups like the illuminati shape events behind the scenes. More relevant to our times, his analysis is very broad and covers a wide variety of global events and is done with an outward confidence that seems to be very appealing to people with little knowledge of the subjects in question. However, it tends to be incredibly superficially, giving overly simplistic causal factors for complex international or historical trends and events, completely overlooks many key elements of these issues and in many instances makes claims that are patently ludicrous. As an example, in one recent interview he stated that China wants the USA to remain in Asia as otherwise it would be in danger of attack by South Korea, Japan, and Russia. Furthermore, he said that were the USA to leave the region Japan would reinforce its Navy to the point that China would be in danger of a blockade. The idea of Japan blockading China is insane for several reasons; 15000km coastline, its Japan's #1 trade partner, it would cause global supply line chaos, and it would certainly escalate into a larger war with China being the only nuclear side. In the same way, the USA leaving would be highly unlikely to make tension between China and Japan increase. Japan and China have actually had relations that switch between positive and negative over the past decades with upwards trends boosted by diplomacy, trade, and direct investment, and downard trends largely a result of US pressure on security issues. With no USA in the region wJapan would have incredibly strong economic and security reasons to boost relations with China. In short, he is a very unreliable commentator riding a huge popularity wave due to inexplicable ranking in various social media algorithms. His fanbase is very vocal however and criticism, such as this, about the reliability of his 'predictions' tends to attract a lot of backlash. In some ways his appeal is understandable, global issues are very complex and it can be nice to have a relatively simple explanation. Its is also appealing to gain access to a 'hidden' knowledge, i.e. a way of seeing the world that the average person is not aware of. In this case however, caveat emptor.
2 of 10
177
Answer: He got picked by the YouTube algorithm when Trump attacks Iran became a popular topic. He predicted a Trump presidency and an attack on Iran using connections between public figures and game theory, but also got many details wrong - he predicted an attack on March 2027, and that it would be an allied coalition attack similar to Iraq. This obviously did not happen, as countries are unwilling to send boats to relieve Hormuz, let alone troops. He's also betting on secret societies hastening the end of the world because apparently that's what all of them want in common.
Videos
02:00:58
Jiang Xueqin: Our True Wealth Is Our Consciousness | Endgame #259 ...
42:53
Jiang Xueqin: The Iran War & the Battle for the Petrodollar - YouTube
01:00:28
Game Theory #23: The WWIII Chessboard - YouTube
58:23
Game Theory #17: The Great Reset - YouTube
17:21
What the Chessboard for WW3 Looks Like - Prof. Jiang Xueqin - YouTube
YouTube
youtube.com › watch
Professor Jiang is an Idiot (Predictive History Reaction) - YouTube
Who is this guy Professor Jiang that everyone is talking about? He runs a channel called Predictive History, where he pretends to be delivering lectures to s...
Published March 19, 2026
Reddit
reddit.com › r/skeptic › who is professor jiang??
r/skeptic on Reddit: Who is Professor Jiang??
December 18, 2025 -
My dad has brought up this guy named Professor Jiang and how he talks a lot about some of the same stuff he believes, which instantly made me think of conspiracies. From my cursory look, he runs a history YouTube channel with some minor success. I don't know nearly enough about history to look at his claims. Is this someone I should warn my dad about?
Top answer 1 of 5
92
He’s a high school teacher in China. According to his channel Predictive History, he uses Models and theories to understand history, to teach about our current predicament, and to make predictions about the future. A model that he frequently uses is Game Theory, and he has several videos analyzing events with this model. I have major problems with his presentations when it comes to his accuracy, how he arrives at his conclusions, and how he does presentations. I watched a video about Ukraine/ Putin from him recently https://youtu.be/ZgvAHZqaawA?si=u_XfdArpJ-Um5vZS I'm going to use this video to show a few examples of where Prof Jiang goes wrong and recurring structural issues across his channel to watch out for. Factual/ Analytical Errors In the first 13 minutes of this video, he discusses the Ukraine war and uses a game theory counterfactual to argue that US/NATO policy towards Ukraine is self-defeating. In his game theory analysis, he presents a counterfactual that states that Ukraine, with zero NATO help, would win the Ukraine war. My issue with this is that he misuses game theory because the counterfactual had no defined objectives, payoffs, or strategic constraints. Instead, he uses a story-like scenario where Russia rapidly conquers eastern Ukraine, Russia encircles Odessa, then Russia becomes logistically overextended, and Overextension + guerrilla warfare makes occupation unsustainable, and Ukraine wins the war. Another issue is that Prof Jiang's counterfactual assumes that a Ukrainian insurgency would succeed under conditions that make it impossible to win when he removes external help. This is wrong because most successful insurgencies throughout history rely on weapons, funding, sanctuary, and intelligence, and most importantly, external support. If you remove Western support, the issues Ukraine's military already had in 2022 with weapons/ammo, air defense, funding, logistics, and ISR get compounded to such a degree that waging an insurgency, let alone winning a war vs Russia with zero external is virtually impossible. The other parts of the video is riddled with factual errors and unfounded claims, for example, he claimed that the Ukraine war wasn’t being ran in Kyiv with Ukrainian leadership but actually NATO runs the entire war from Brussels with NATO commanders literally issuing commands to Ukrainian troops, and then uses this to explain that because NATO is literally running the war Russian troops have adapted to NATO strategy and have emerged successful. The problem I have with this claim is that it directly contradicts his counterfactual where Ukraine wins the war via guerrilla warfare because he claimed that Russia is incapable of fighting Ukraine with zero NATO help but then once NATO support is introduced, Russia suddenly gains the ability to adapt without explaining how Russia would adapt in more dire conditions. His argument suggests that fighting a NATO backed Ukraine is easier for Russia than dealing with an independent Ukrainian insurgency with zero outside help. Turning Vladimir Putin's Biography into a Civilizational Narrative When he talks about Vladimir Putin, he uses a couple of anecdotes from his biography that state that Putin's mother is religious and that Putin worked with the KGB. He uses these two anecdotes to spin an entire story that there was a secret Orthodox church and KGB faction that saw Stalin as a messiah, spent decades grooming Putin as the second coming of Stalin, and is now using the Ukraine war to fulfill a religious prophecy about conquering Turkey and restoring the Byzantine Empire. My issue is that he makes extraordinary claims and doesn't back anything up anything about the KBG/ church faction in the USSR, and he used 2 anecdotes to extrapolate this civilizational narrative that don't even come close to logically following the premises and sounds more like a mythical story. My biggest issues with him: He misuses game theory His presentations tend to sound more like telling a civilizational story than an explanation He looks for grand overarching narratives and uses assumptions to fill in gaps with his arguments He tends to make extraordinary claims without evidence He covers a very wide range of topics, which can come at the expense of depth, and in this case, leads to a shallow understanding of the subject, resulting in bad analysis I understand why people are drawn to his content because he seems independent and encourages skepticism of authority and state narratives, is skilled at simplifying complex frameworks, making predictions, and sharing ideas, and is a very confident speaker. I believe that he is also successful due to the loss of trust in institutions in the West and people losing faith in democracy and mainstream media, and consuming alternative media not aligned with any institutions. My issues with him aren't about him questioning mainstream narratives, but with how he arrives at his conclusions and how knowledgeable he is on certain topics. For his videos on geopolitics his errors can be so egregious that I wouldn't recommend his analysis. Edit: my first post was overly emotional, and I didn't go into much detail, and I tried to improve on some errors I made.
2 of 5
85
He seems to have had some success in predicting one or two major events, but that kind of stuff is the same way that a stopped clock is still right twice a day. One of his more recent analysis was about the Bondi shootings but he asks a couple of dumb questions that are answerable if you are in Australia and have broad access to Australian media. For one, he asks 'how was it that authorities so quickly and easily found the shooter's car' and the answer is that there were literally dead people in front of it who initially tried to stop the shooters while they were taking out the weapons. The second idiotic question he asks is 'How is that so many high-resolution video sequences and drone footages were immediately available so soon after the event' and it is honestly staggering the ignorance with which he posits this question as an allegation. Bondi beach is one of the busiest and most iconic beaches in Sydney, visited by millions - locals AND tourists alike, while also being residential - people live around it in apartments and dwellings. I think that given he's got a few things right now he's high on his own rhetoric and punching out stupid analysis' that are born of ignorance, not knowledge. There was a guy on one of the conspiracy forums who would literally post every day with gematria predictions about world events and it's the modus operandi of these clowns to spam dozens of predictions, and hopefully one of them will come true - except it's just plain luck after shotgunning hundreds of tries. When I started noting his predictions down and ran a monthly tally of everything he got wrong, he blocked me. I would put Jiang in the same column as astronomer Avi Loeb - he's an accomplished academic who now enjoys the attention when he steps out of line.
Spotify
open.spotify.com › show › 2r5AAWKXmegBwNLFZVnkWe
Predictive History - Professor Jiang Xueqin - Spotify
We cannot provide a description for this page right now
YouTube
youtube.com › watch
Professor Jiang: World War 3 Is About To Begin, Let Me Explain! - YouTube
Professor Jiang predicted Trump would win the election, America would go to war with Iran, and that the United States would lose that war. Now he reveals why...
Published 3 weeks ago
Reddit
reddit.com › r/geopolitics › thoughts on professor jiang?
r/geopolitics on Reddit: Thoughts on professor jiang?
March 7, 2026 - He refers to himself as a professor but only has an undergraduate degree in, ironically, English Literature. No Masters, no PhD. He has no exceptional affiliations of higher education. Jiang teaches at Moonshot Academy high school in Beijing, and previously worked at Peking University High School and Shenzhen Middle School.
Study International
studyinternational.com › news › the-education-of-professor-jiang
Where and what did Professor Jiang's study before fame
Get a PhD, teach as an associate professor. Climb the academic ladder. Build a solid research track record. ... Instead, he became the world’s most-watched YouTuber lecturer, teaching western philosophy, English literature, and geopolitical forecasting to millions online. The thing is, Jiang became known in 2024, gaining recognition for his two predictions: that Trump would win in 2024, and that the US-Iran military confrontation would follow.
Published April 27, 2026
Factually
factually.co › prof jiang
Who Is 'Professor Jiang'?
3 weeks ago - Two different public figures called "Professor Jiang" are conflated in media: Jiang Shigong, a Chinese legal theorist and university president, and Jiang Xueqin (also styled "Professor Jiang"), a Beijing-based educator and online commentator whose viral geopolitical forecasts have drawn global ...