So it begins . . . More on reddit.com

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11934223/Allegations-Democrat-Katie-Porters-abusive-marriage-resurface.html But after reports claimed she used abusive language toward staff, her divorce documents have resurfaced to DailyMail.com. Even for a tabloid, that is terrible writing. ...and they are taking a long, long time getting to any accusations of abuse to her staff. Why do they care so much about her wearing a BatGirl costume in 2019? Last year text messages came to light where an angry Porter told a staffer, Wounded Warrior fellow Sasha Georgiades 'You gave me Covid' and told her not to return to the office. As a boss, Georgiades, who spent two years with Porter's office, told DailyMail.com she felt Porter was 'very dismissive' and 'short-tempered.' 'It didn't really take much to make her upset,' Georgiades said, recounting a time when she wrote a brief for a call Porter was about to place to congratulate a student on being accepted to a service academy. 'I forgot to change 'she' to 'he' on a brief,' she said, 'I just forgot to change one part ... I got in trouble for that because I would have ruined her phone call to this kid. It's like, why are you yelling at me?' That's not much. ...and now they are back to the husband's allegations. They are clearly sandwiching the staffer's quotes between more sensational accusations from the husband in an attempt to obscure how little there is from the staffer. Porter filed for - and won - a temporary emergency protective order against her husband. Hoffman, in turn, filed his own domestic violence restraining order. Both claimed the other had filed one in retaliation to better their standing with the law. Yep. That is a perfectly valid reason to doubt the claims. In 2014, the pair came to an agreement: Porter would pay her ex-husband spousal and child support, and they would share custody of the children - 70 percent of the time with Porter and 30 percent with Hoffman. ...and that makes it look like the court was siding with Porter. (If the court was convinced by the allegations of abusive behavior, then he could have gotten more than 30 percent custody. The deal hints that he couldn't.) Porter's campaign notes that according to a petitioner's brief, Hoffman regretted making the allegations against his wife as they were hashing out a custody and financial agreement. ...and that's a retraction. ...and that's the end. TL;DR: Many people hurl awful accusations at each other during divorce proceedings; they are to be taken with a grain of salt. In this case, the accusations against Porter seem to have been retracted. The staffer's description is not a description of abusive behavior. Furthermore, this article is clearly deliberately constructed to suggest that there is a history of accusations of abuse against her staff, but there wasn't. The author was hoping to trick you, and they succeeded. (You should stop reading tabloids.) More on reddit.com

Oh boy it’s this story again about a “proud veteran staffer” who had to break office Covid protocols to go to a funeral.

I’m catching the vapors on persecution of such an injustice. I can’t believe Porter would be upset that she got Covid because of this incident and would reprimand said employee for breaking policy. /s

More on reddit.com

Fox News huh? Very sus post OP.

More on reddit.com