Ooh, I get to say this to someone other a fellow atheist: Remember, Christians have read the bible. There have been entire orginisations of people who literally spend their entire adult professional lives doing nothing but read the bible for two thousand years. If you think you've found the one Christianity Refuting Verse that they missed, no you haven't. In the same chapter, Jesus calls himself the Son of God, and claims to be one with the Father. Henceforth, simplified, the trinity- Jesus claims both to be a divine being and to not be The Heavenly Father, and there is one god, ergo "the Heavenly Father and the Son are both God, but not the same being". Now, obviously, I don't believe Jesus is God and neither do you, albeit for very different reasons. We both think you can show that he isn't. But if proving that was as simple as showing one bible verse, neither of us would be here because Christianity would never have got off the ground. They know about this verse, they've got defences of this verse, this debate has been going on since the first century AD. You're late to the party here.

In Mark 13:19, Jesus refers to "the creation which GOD created". He doesn't say, "the creation which I created", or the creation which WE created". If he'd meant "I", or "we", would he not have said as much? Was Jesus not speaking plainly and clearly to his disciples here? Clearly, Jesus is speaking here of God the Father, the same being he calls "the only true God". To say that there's a vast difference between saying " the only true God" versus " the one God" is sheer speculation.