prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES · Syllabus · TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. v. CASA, INC., ET AL. ON APPLICATION FOR PARTIAL STAY · No. 24A884. Argued May 15, 2025—Decided June 27, 2025* Plaintiffs (respondents here)—individuals, organizations, and States— ·

5 days ago - After Trump's order was passed, one district judge wrote: "U.S. citizenship is a right no less precious than life or liberty," and that the policy "conflicts with the plain language of the 14th Amendment, contradicts 125-year-old binding Supreme Court precedent and runs counter to our nation’s 250-year history of citizenship by birth." However, there is debate among scholars over what the amendment's principle means, with some arguing that being born in the U.S. is a clear right to citizenship, while others say birth alone does not give a person direct citizenship. Harold Krent, professor of law at the Chicago-Kent School of Law, said in a Bloomberg Law podcast on December 27 that he thought the Supreme Court would "deal the Trump administration a blow" in this case, and find that the order is "inconsistent" with the amendment.

June 27, 2025 · Today, on the last day of the 2024-2025 term, the Supreme Court of the United States issued five decisions: Trump v. CASA, Inc., No. 24A884: This case addresses whether district courts had the authority to issue nationwide injunctions barring executive officials from applying ...

September 29, 2025 - On Friday, June 27, we live blogged the court’s final day of issuing opinions on the merits docket for the 2024-25 term. The cases decided were Trump v. CASA, Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, FCC v. Consumers’ Research, Mahmoud v. Taylor, ...

Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, Inc. (June 27, 2025) Members of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force within the Department of Health and Human Services are inferior executive officers who may be appointed by the Secretary of Health and Human ...

prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES · Syllabus · MAHMOUD ET AL. v. TAYLOR ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR · THE FOURTH CIRCUIT · No. 24–297. Argued April 22, 2025—Decided June 27, 2025 ·

The Supreme Court began hearing cases for the term on October 4, 2021. The court's yearly term begins on the first Monday in October and lasts until the first Monday in October the following year. The court generally releases the majority of its decisions in mid-June.[2]

June 27, 2025 - The high court ruled that the schools ... on Friday upheld the fee that is added to phone bills to provide billions of dollars a year in subsidized phone and internet services in schools, libraries and rural areas.The justices, ...

August 1, 2025 - On June 27, the Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump what he hailed as a “GIANT WIN,” finding that lower courts had “likely” overstepped in ordering universal injunctions blocking many of the president’s policies.

June 27, 2023 · Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued three decisions: Mallory v. Norfolk Southern R. Co., No. 21-1168: This case addressed whether companies consent to jurisdiction in states where they have registered to do business.

June 27, 2024 · The Supreme Court of the United States issued four decisions today: Moyle v. United States; Idaho v. United States, Nos.

2 weeks ago - Oral arguments were heard on May ... for the various states. On June 27, the Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that, “Universal injunctions likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has given to federal courts."...

Today, on the last day of the 2024-2025 term, the Supreme Court of the United States issued five decisions: Trump v. CASA, Inc., No. 24A884: This case addresses whether district...

June 30, 2025 - The Supreme Court ruled that Montgomery County Public Schools must allow religious opt-outs from any lessons that parents believe will interfere with the religious development of their children, including LGBTQ-themed materials.