Supreme Court of the United States
supremecourt.gov › opinions › 24pdf › 24a884_8n59.pdf pdf
24A884 Trump v. CASA, Inc. (06/27/2025)
prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES · Syllabus · TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. v. CASA, INC., ET AL. ON APPLICATION FOR PARTIAL STAY · No. 24A884. Argued May 15, 2025—Decided June 27, 2025* Plaintiffs (respondents here)—individuals, organizations, and States— ·
SCOTUSblog
scotusblog.com › 2025 › 06 › announcement-of-opinions-for-friday-june-27
Announcement of opinions for Friday, June 27 | SCOTUSblog
June 27, 2025 - On Friday, June 27, we live blogged the court’s final day of issuing opinions on the merits docket for the 2024-25 term. The cases decided were Trump v. CASA, Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, FCC v. Consumers’ Research, Mahmoud v. Taylor, ...
Videos
02:51
Supreme Court decision dump, June 27, 2025: What to know | NBC4 ...
01:40
Supreme Court Update | Scotus Medicaid abortion ruling Friday | ...
26:06
Supreme Court issues key ruling surrounding Trump's birthright ...
02:24
‘A huge decision’: Supreme Court limits ability of judges to ...
PBS News Hour | Supreme Court rulings could have far-reaching ...
02:01
Supreme Court limits nationwide injunctions, but fate of Trump ...
ProPublica
propublica.org › home › archive › a troubling milestone: most supreme court rulings are secretive votes with little justification
A Troubling Milestone: Most Supreme Court Rulings Are Secretive Votes With Little Justification
1 week ago - These emergency decisions have thrown lower courts’ processes into turmoil and have sometimes directly contradicted longstanding legal precedent. The outcomes have been consequential: The high court has used the process to limit federal courts from issuing nationwide injunctions and diminished Congress’ authority over federal agencies, and it has allowed for the detention of American citizens by immigration agents. ProPublica analyzed over two decades of Supreme Court rulings, which cover all of the years under Chief Justice John Roberts and go as far back as the online archives allow. We found that when the last court term ended, justices had issued 63 orders on the shadow docket, as opposed to 56 orders on the more traditional merits docket — where the court hears oral arguments scheduled months in advance and the justices issue signed opinions.
Dorsey
dorsey.com › newsresources › publications › client-alerts › 2025 › 6 › supreme-court-eupdate-june-27
The Supreme Court Update - June 27, 2025 | News & Resources | Dorsey
June 27, 2025 - June 27, 2025 · Today, on the last day of the 2024-2025 term, the Supreme Court of the United States issued five decisions: Trump v. CASA, Inc., No. 24A884: This case addresses whether district courts had the authority to issue nationwide injunctions barring executive officials from applying ...
Supreme Court of the United States
supremecourt.gov › opinions › 24pdf › 24-297_4f14.pdf pdf
24-297 Mahmoud v. Taylor (06/27/2025)
prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES · Syllabus · MAHMOUD ET AL. v. TAYLOR ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR · THE FOURTH CIRCUIT · No. 24–297. Argued April 22, 2025—Decided June 27, 2025 ·
Justia
supreme.justia.com
Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center
Trump v. Barbara (June 30, 2026) The Constitution guarantees citizenship to children born of parents unlawfully or temporarily present in the United States. Trump v. Cook (June 29, 2026) Courts may assess the validity of a President's removal ...
American Bar Association
americanbar.org › groups › criminal_justice › resources › supreme-court
Supreme Court Case Summaries and Updates
Quick and concise summary of current US Supreme Court cases on criminal justice on the day of the decision provided by the ABA Criminal Justice Section office. (June 29, 2026; Justice Kagan delivered the opinion of the Court in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Sotomayor, Kavanaugh and Jackson joined. Justice Jackson wrote a concurring opinion in which Justice Sotomayor joined. Justice Gorsuch wrote and opinion concurring in the judgment. Justice Altito filed a dissenting opinion in which Justice Thomas joined as to Part I, and which Justice Barrett joined in Parts IIB, IIC1, IIC2. Justice Barret wrote a dissenting opinion.) The Court held that police officers conducted a Fourth Amendment search when they acquired Okello Chatrie’s location data from Google because an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell-phone location information.
SCOTUSblog
scotusblog.com › 2026 › 06 › key-takeaways-from-a-jam-packed-order-list
Key takeaways from a jam-packed order list | SCOTUSblog
2 weeks ago - Currently, five states allow for ... 2026-27 term, involving the ability to sue federal officials for violating constitutional rights even when there is no law specifically authorizing such a claim....
Mynbc5
mynbc5.com › article › supreme-court-decisions-june-27-2025 › 65227376
Today in the Supreme Court: A recap of Friday's decisions
June 27, 2025 - The high court ruled that the schools ... on Friday upheld the fee that is added to phone bills to provide billions of dollars a year in subsidized phone and internet services in schools, libraries and rural areas.The justices, ...
Fox News
foxnews.com › politics › 11-upcoming-supreme-court-decisions-could-make-break-trumps-second-term-agenda
Supreme Court decisions on Trump's power, immigration loom in June | Fox News
The administration argues the Department of Homeland Security has broad discretion to end some Temporary Protected Status protections for migrants from certain countries, arguing protections are intended to be temporary. Migrant advocates counter that federal law requires specific procedures and allows courts to review those decisions. The conservative court majority has signaled its support for the Homeland Security secretary's discretionary power to revoke deportation protections for 13 countries on the TPS list. SUPREME COURT PREPARES FOR MAJOR TEST OF PRESIDENTIAL POWER IN TRUMP EFFORTS TO FIRE FEDERAL RESERVE GOVERNOR · In Trump v. Cook, the justices are weighing whether Trump can dismiss Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook. Based on January's oral arguments, the court appears ready to give President Trump one of his biggest legal setbacks in office, offering strong support for Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook remaining in her leadership position — at least for now.
Published 4 weeks ago
Democracy Forward
democracyforward.org › work › research › peoples-guide-scotus-25-26
The People’s Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court: 2025-2026 - Democracy Forward
April 7, 2026 - See the full list of “friend of the court” (amicus) briefs on the Supreme Court docket. ... Since 2020, 27 states have banned transgender youth from playing school sports. Some of these bans allow for invasive forms of sex testing that put all female student athletes at risk and open the door for any school official or adult to question and harass children playing sports. In West Virginia v. B.P.J., a young transgender girl who wished to run on her school’s girls’ track team brought a lawsuit challenging West Virginia’s trans sports ban as a violation of the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause as well as Title IX, the federal law prohibiting sex discrimination in education. In Little v. Hecox, a transgender college athlete and a cisgender high school athlete challenged Idaho’s trans sports ban and requirements for sex testing as violations of the Equal Protection Clause.
POLITICO
politico.com › supreme-court-legal-news-updates-analysis
Supreme Court and Legal Issues: Latest News, Top Stories and Analysis - POLITICO
By Jessica Piper and Josh Gerstein | June 30, 2026 10:27 AM · Supreme Court upholds laws banning trans athletes from women’s sports · The 6-3 ruling upholds state laws in Idaho and West Virginia. By Bianca Quilantan and Josh Gerstein | June 30, 2026 10:08 AM · Self-exiled Chinese billionaire ...
JD Supra
jdsupra.com › legalnews › the-supreme-court-update-june-27-2025-8519750
The Supreme Court Update - June 27, 2025 | Dorsey & Whitney LLP - JDSupra
June 30, 2025 - Today, on the last day of the 2024-2025 term, the Supreme Court of the United States issued five decisions: Trump v. CASA, Inc., No. 24A884: This case addresses whether district...
Darrell Issa
issa.house.gov › media › in-the-news › icymi-supreme-court-killed-universal-injunctions-name-only
ICYMI – Supreme Court Killed Universal Injunctions in Name Only | Representative Darrell Issa
August 1, 2025 - On June 27, the Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump what he hailed as a “GIANT WIN,” finding that lower courts had “likely” overstepped in ordering universal injunctions blocking many of the president’s policies.While the Court’s 6-3 opinion in Trump v. CASA appeared to ...
Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › List_of_pending_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases
List of pending United States Supreme Court cases - Wikipedia
1 day ago - 2025 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States · ↑ "2026–27 Term". Oyez. Retrieved June 26, 2026.
American Civil Liberties Union
aclu.org › news › free-speech › live-coverage-final-scotus-decision-day
Live Coverage: Final SCOTUS Decision Day | American Civil Liberties Union
June 30, 2025 - The Supreme Court ruled that Montgomery County Public Schools must allow religious opt-outs from any lessons that parents believe will interfere with the religious development of their children, including LGBTQ-themed materials.
The Hill
thehill.com › regulation › court-battles › 5941656-supreme-court-immigration-decisions
5 takeaways from Supreme Court’s big rulings on immigration, guns
2 weeks ago - The court agreed 6-3 that the policy complies with federal law. Trump’s streak on immigration at the Supreme Court may not last. The justices still have yet to rule on whether his birthright citizenship order can stand.
Supreme Court of the United States
supremecourt.gov › opinions › slipopinion › 25
2008 Term Opinions of the Court
The opinions collected here are those issued during October Term 2025 (October 5, 2025, through October 3, 2026). Opinions are posted on the website upon release in slip opinion format. Slip opinions remain posted until replaced with opinions edited to reflect the usual publication style of the United States Reports, including final pagination that will carry forward unchanged in the corresponding preliminary prints and the bound volumes of the United States Reports
Reuters
reuters.com › legal › government › us-supreme-court-may-rule-allowing-enforcement-trump-birthright-citizenship-2025-06-27
Supreme Court in birthright case limits judges' power to block presidential policies | Reuters
June 27, 2025 - Conservative justices power the ... - The U.S. Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a major victory on Friday in a case involving birthright citizenship by curbing the ability of judges to impede his policies nationwide, changing ...
SCOTUSblog
scotusblog.com › 2026 › 06 › court-adds-three-cases-to-2026-27-docket
Court adds three cases to 2026-27 docket | SCOTUSblog
3 weeks ago - After any opinion announcements on Thursday, the justices will meet in a private conference to discuss cases and vote on petitions for review. Orders from that conference are expected on Monday, June 22, at 9:30 a.m. EDT. ... On Monday, the Supreme Court announced that it will not “take up the oldest active federal judge’s bid to end her suspension, which her colleagues issued after she refused their demands for mental fitness testing,” according to The Hill. “Pauline Newman, who turns 99 on Saturday and rejects the notion she is unfit to serve, sued her fellow judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit after they indefinitely prevented her from taking on new cases.” By rejecting her petition for review, the justices leave in place a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit holding that “federal district judges have no authority to hear lawsuits challenging judicial misconduct decisions.” ...