🌐
Merriam-Webster
merriam-webster.com › grammar & usage › punctuation › word division dots and syllable hyphens | merriam-webster
Word Division Dots and Syllable Hyphens | Merriam-Webster
June 26, 2023 - They do not necessarily show syllable division (which is the common misconception); they are simply potential points of end-of-line division. Syllabication of a word is indicated by the hyphens found in the word's pronunciation, where they exist ...

inserting hyphens in words

Syllabification (/sɪˌlæbɪfɪˈkeɪʃən/) or syllabication (/sɪˌlæbɪˈkeɪʃən/), also known as hyphenation, is the separation of a word into syllables, whether spoken, written or signed. The written separation into syllables is usually marked by a … Wikipedia
🌐
Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Syllabification
Syllabification - Wikipedia
2 weeks ago - For presentation purposes, typographers may use an interpunct (Unicode character U+00B7, e.g., syl·la·ble), a special-purpose "hyphenation point" (U+2027, e.g., syl‧la‧ble), or a space (e.g., syl la ble). At the end of a line, a word is separated in writing into parts, conventionally called "syllables", if it does not fit the line and if moving it to the next line would make the first line much shorter than the others.
Top answer
1 of 3
1

I worked on that script on the English Wiktionary and it's not perfect. It's actually really hard to automatically syllabize words with a script.

I would syllabize that word as "pa‧fi‧lo" and the script was supposed to syllabize it like that. Somebody overrode the script. I corrected it.

2 of 3
1

There are no obligatory rules nor is there an overwhelming tendency in practice for hyphenation in Esperanto. In a Lingva Respondo ("Linguistic Answer") from 1893*, Zamenhof stated that morphological hyphenation would be most logical, but that the question in fact is not important and you can divide words as you like.

It is my impression, however, that the most common, if at all, kind of hyphenation today is according to syllables. The syllable structure of Esperanto is partly flexible nevertheless, you can get an impression from the §§2-3 in the Fundamenta Ekzercaro.

(*) La Esperantisto, 1893, p. 32

Transportante la vortojn el unu linio en la sekvantan, ni ordinare dividas ilin per iliaj partoj gramatikaj, ĉar ĉiu parto gramatika en nia lingvo prezentas apartan vorton. Tiel ni ekzemple dividas: «Esper-anto», «ricev-ita» k.t.p. Sed tio ĉi tute ne estas deviga regulo; ni faras ĝin nur por ne rompi subite kun la kutimoj de aliaj lingvoj: efektive tiu ĉi maniero havas nenian celon kaj signifon, ĉar la transportado de la vortoj estas afero pure papera, havanta nenion komunan kun la leĝoj de la lingvo; ni konsilas al vi per nenio vin ĝeni en la dividado de la vortoj kaj fari ĝin tute tiel, kiel en la donita okazo estos al vi pli oportune. Eĉ se vi dividos ekzemple «aparteni-s», ni vidus en tio ĉi nenion malregulan, kvankam la aliaj lingvoj (tute sen ia logika kaŭzo) ne permesas tian dividadon.

🌐
Hyphenation24
hyphenation24.com › home › syllable
syllable » Online hyphenation » Hyphenation24
October 5, 2014 - Check hyphenation for 'syllable' on Hyphenation24.
🌐
WikiDiff
wikidiff.com › syllable › hyphenate
Syllable vs Hyphenate - What's the difference? | WikiDiff
August 27, 2024 - As nouns the difference between syllable and hyphenate is that syllable is (linguistics) a unit of human speech that is interpreted by the listener as a single sound, although syllables usually consist of one or more vowel sounds, either alone or combined with the sound of one or more consonants; a word consists of one or more syllables while hyphenate is...
🌐
Style Manual
stylemanual.gov.au › grammar-punctuation-and-conventions › punctuation › hyphens
Hyphens | Style Manual
Two-syllable prefixes ending in a vowel other than ‘o’ and followed by another vowel are often hyphenated.
🌐
Suny Empire
sunyempire.edu › online-writing-support › resources › punctuation › hyphens
Hyphens | Empire State University
One-syllable words should never be hyphenated, as well as contractions, numbers, abbreviations, or initials.
🌐
Hyphenation24
hyphenation24.com › home
Easily check hyphenation online - Hyphenation24
The written separation is usually marked by a hyphen when using English orthography (e.g., syl-la-ble) and with a period when transcribing in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA).
Find elsewhere
🌐
Butte-Glenn Community College
butte.edu › departments › cas › tipsheets › punctuation › hyphen.html
The Hyphen - TIP Sheets - Department Name - Butte College
Do not divide a word between syllables if only one letter remains alone or if only two letters begin a line. ... It was difficult to determine whether she was totally a- fraid of the dark or just trying to gain sympathy. We realized she was trying to get attention, so we simp- ly ignored her. In this case, simply move the entire word (afraid or simply) to the next line. Always divide a hyphenated compound word at the hyphen.
🌐
Reddit
reddit.com › r/asklinguistics › what is the point of hyphenations in dictionaries, do they represent syllables and if so was i taught syllabification theory wrong by my profs?
r/asklinguistics on Reddit: What is the point of hyphenations in dictionaries, do they represent syllables and if so was I taught syllabification theory wrong by my profs?
June 28, 2024 -

I got into a discussion with someone recently about the syllabification of <nothing> and whether it was <no-thing> (what I was saying) or <noth-ing> (what they were saying). I was saying that I'm a Linguistics undergrad and I've had to do a lot of weekly problem sets and tutorial activities with TAs on syllabifiying stuff in different languages and one of the first things I learned was that languages will always add as many things to the onset as possible. In the case of <nothing> /ɪŋ/ has no onset and /θ/ is a valid onset in English so /θ/ should act as the onset, it's not even creating a consonant cluster.

However they rightly pointed out that several different dictionaries syllabified it their way, dictionary.com did [ nuhth-ing ] and even in IPA did / ˈnʌθ ɪŋ /, not marking the syllable boundary with a . but still with a space. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/nothing And while they didn't mention Wiktionary, Wiktionary has a thing called "hyphenation" where for <nothing> it's "Hyphenation: noth‧ing" and assuming this is meant to mark syllabification (I don't see what else it could be) then is more evidence in their favour.

Now they pointed out that they had actual sources and all I had were my words and of course they were right. I'd never actually done a reading on syllabification, all I had were lecture slides and the grades on my homework assignments, not actual sources, and they had actual sources, actual dictionaries. They suggested to me 3 possible explanations, I misremembered, unlikely given how much time I'd spent on this over 2 years so far, it was a regional difference, also unlikely given that I've had TAs and profs from all over the anglosphere (Southern US, California, Canada, Nigeria for phonology) and a regional difference upending what I was taught as the golden rule of syllabification seems odd to me, or I was mistaught, the most likely of the 3.

Now obviously I don't think all these people like messed up in teaching me, afaik it's a good program at a good school, though of course if my entire education were misinformed I wouldn't have the skills to comprehend that because the skills I was given were flawed, but that's a path that makes me uncomfortable. I understand that teachers often simplify things for newer students and maybe this rule I was taught actually has way more exceptions than I was taught but this was left for 3rd, or 4th, or master's, or PhD phonology. If this is the case then how does this rule actually work and what conditions <nothing> to behave differently to how I was taught. If this was not the case and I was taught correctly, why do so many dictionaries use this method that doesn't actually represent phonology, what are they instead representing. Sorry if this was too long, I just like phonology and don't like the idea of thinking I understand something and having that all upended.

Edit: weirdly Merriam Webster has for the IPA https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nothing "ˈnə-thiŋ" so I don't even know anymore

Top answer
1 of 4
58

The easiest thing to do, and the only way of being sure you agree with the authorities, is to look words up in the dictionary. Some of the hyphenations currently in American dictionaries make no sense at all. For example, the reason that prai-rie and fair-y are hyphenated the way they are seems to be that 150 years ago, the editors of Webster's dictionary thought they didn't rhyme1; prairie was pronounced pray-ree with a long 'a', while fairy was pronounced fair-ee with an r-colored 'a'.

That said, there are a few hyphenation rules that will let you hyphenate 90% of English words properly (and your hyphenations of the remaining 10% will be perfectly reasonable, even if they disagree with the authorities'). Here they are, in roughly decreasing order of priority:

  • Break words at morpheme boundaries (inter-face, pearl-y, but ear-ly).
  • Break words between doubled consonants — 'sc' counts here but not 'ck'. (bat-tle, as-cent, jack-et).
  • Never separate an English digraph (e.g., th, ch, sh, ph, gh, ng, qu) when pronounced as a single unit (au-thor but out-house).
  • Never break a word before a string of consonants that cannot begin a word in English (anx-ious and not an-xious).
  • Never break a word after a short vowel in an accented syllable (rap-id but stu-pid).

Finally, if the above rules leave more than one acceptable break between syllables, use the Maximal Onset Principle:

  • If there is a string of consonants between syllables, break this string as far to the left as you can (mon-strous).

There are lots of exceptions to these rules:

Sometimes the rules conflict with each other. For example, ra-tio-nal gets hyphenated after a short vowel in an accented syllable because ti acts as a digraph indicating that the 't' should be pronounced 'sh'.

Sometimes it's not clear what constitutes a morpheme boundary: why ger-mi-nate and not germ-i-nate?

Sometimes the pronunciation of a word varies—/væpɪd/ or /veɪpɪd/? Merriam-Webster and American Heritage dictionaries agree that both pronunciations are valid, but they disagree about the hyphenation.

And some hyphenations I can't figure out the reason for: the Maximum Onset Principle would suggest pa-stry, but the authorities all agree on pas-try.

1I believe some American dialects still make this distinction in pronunciation; the editors of Webster's dictionary weren't imagining things.

2 of 4
24

Vincent McNabb gives good advice generally on when to hyphenate—never if you can get away with it, and if you must, in a sensible place.

However, the question of where to hyphenate is something that dictionaries have answered for generations. Every entry has a word split into syllables, and technically speaking, according to traditional rules of typesetting, you can hyphenate a word at any syllable boundary. For example in the Merriam-Webster's online dictionary, the entry for "dictionary" reads "dic·tio·nary"—so you could hyphenate anywhere there appears a centered dot. Of course there are various rules of thumb and heuristics to choose the best place to hyphenate, and in many cases hyphenating a word dramatically reduces readability, but in a strict answer to OP's original question, it is acceptable to hyphenate a word at any syllable boundary, and you can find all the syllable boundaries in a dictionary.

🌐
Juiciobrennan
juiciobrennan.com › hyphenator
Lyric Hyphenator | Juicio Brennan
This is great for choir directors who can simply and easily paste code into their music writing programs. This prevents the need from paying for expensive module in programs like CakeWalk. The hyphen notation allows each syllable to be easily and quickly paired with its corresponding note.It ...
🌐
CRAN
cran.r-project.org › web › packages › sylly › vignettes › sylly_vignette.html
Using the sylly Package for Hyphenation and Syllable Count
hyphen() might not produce perfect results. As a rule of thumb, if in doubt it seems to behave rather conservative, that is, is might underestimate the real number of syllables in a text.
🌐
PrintWiki
printwiki.org › Hyphenation
Hyphenation - PrintWiki
In typography, the breaking of a word into syllables and inserting hyphens, manually or automatically, so that word spaces remain consistent—within prescribed limits—for proper justification.
🌐
Taylor & Francis Online
tandfonline.com › home › all journals › education › scientific studies of reading › list of issues › volume 26, issue 1 › the effect of syllable-level hyphenation ....
Full article: The Effect of Syllable-level Hyphenation on Novel Word Reading in Early Finnish Readers: Evidence from Eye Movements
The use of hyphenation does not give rise to enhanced processing of phonology in novel words and is likely to hinder the processes connected to the use of orthography. Finnish is a language with shallow orthography and simple syllable structure (Seymour, Aro, & Erskine, Citation2003).
Top answer
1 of 1
3

As you have already found, there seems to be discrepancies from various sources on how to hyphenate "standardize." The main problem is that there is no universal standard on how to hyphenate words, at least in English (can't speak for other languages). Depending on the dictionary or style manual you are using, each could give a different hyphenation variation for the same word.

Syllables

Syllabification is one of, but not the only thing, that can determine the hyphenation of a word in English. Syllabification is determined by the pronunciation of the word, not the spelling, so the pronunciation used is one factor that can alter the hyphenation of a word.

To determine the syllabification of standardize, I am going to use the American English pronunciation as an example:

stændəɹdɑɪz

The first step is to determine which are the consonant phonemes and which are the vowels and vowel-like phonemes, which in this case resolves to:

s | t | æ | n | d | ə | ɹ | d | ɑɪ | z
C | C | V | C | C | V | C | C | V  | C

A syllable can have three parts, the onset, the nucleus, and the coda. The nucleus is made up of the vowel or vowel-like sounds and is a required part of the syllable. The onset is the consonants that prefix the nucleus, and the coda is the consonants that come after.

There are several phonological rules (sonority sequencing principle, phonotactic constraints) that control how to divide consonants between nuclei, but most of them are irrelevant to this question. What we are interested is the maximum onset principle. Without the maximum onset principle, we can determine the syllabification so far as follows:

s | t | æ | n | d | ə | ɹ | d | ɑɪ | z
C | C | V | C | C | V | C | C | V  | C
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ? | 2 | 2 | ? | 3  | 3

In this case, both d's in standardize are intervocalic consonants, which often sound as if they could be part of either the preceding syllable or the subsequent one. The maximum onset principle states that when the syllabification of intervocalic consonants are in question, the consonant should be assigned to the subsequent syllable, in order to give the syllable the maximum onset possible, i.e. if the d in standard was assigned to the first syllable, as in stand-ard, the second syllable would not have an onset at all, so the d should be assigned to the second.

Following these rules, standardize should be hyphenated as stan-dar-dize.

Etymology

However! English hyphenation does not only take pronunciation into account, it also takes into account etymology. Standardize can be divided into a root word (standard) and suffix (ize), putting the hyphenation divider between standard and ize instead of standar and dize.

Conclusion

Taking both etymology and pronunciation into account, as I believe most would do in the case of determine hyphenation for line breaks, I would personally lean toward standardize being divided as

stan-dard-ize

This takes into account pronunciation for the dividing line between the first two syllables and etymology to divide the second and last.

From a purely pronunciation perspective (and as should be listed in a dictionary), I would break it up as:

stan-dar-dize

Still, as I said, there is nothing governing or enforcing these rules especially in regards to when etymology trumps phonological syllabification, hence the variations you see.

Other Links:

  1. LingPipe: Hyphenation and Syllabification Tutorial
  2. IPA pronunciation of standardize from Cambridge Dictionary Online
  3. Anatomy of a Syllable
🌐
Cengage
college.cengage.com › english › raimes › digitalkeys › keyshtml › basic_ru.htm
Basic Rules for Hyphenation
Basic Rules for Hyphenation · See also · With Prefixes With Compound Nouns and Adjectives With Numbers At End of Line
🌐
WordReference
forum.wordreference.com › english only › english only
1-syllable or 2-syllable: safe, nice | WordReference Forums
August 14, 2007 - Normally, it's a single syllable, ... pronounced in two syllables. In some parts of the U.S., such as in the aforementioned Texas, "real" is pronounced REE-yuhl. Now, just to muddy the waters a bit more, you have prefixes that usually are not ...