2022–24 British immigration policy

Rwanda asylum plan - Wikipedia
rishi sunak holds a press conference on the rwanda asylum plan 22 april 2024
minister for countering illegal migration michael tomlinson during the signing of the safety of rwanda bill 22 4 2024 8
home secretary james cleverly visits rwanda on 5 december 2023 3
prime minister rishi sunak meets rwandan president kagame 52870735268
The UK and Rwanda Migration and Economic Development Partnership was an immigration policy proposed by the governments of Boris Johnson, Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak whereby people whom the United Kingdom identified … Wikipedia

Factsheet

Country United Kingdom
Factsheet
Country United Kingdom
🌐
Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Rwanda_asylum_plan
Rwanda asylum plan - Wikipedia
2 weeks ago - The UK and Rwanda Migration and Economic Development Partnership was an immigration policy proposed by the governments of Boris Johnson, Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak whereby people whom the United Kingdom identified as illegal immigrants or asylum seekers would have been relocated to Rwanda for ...
🌐
Migration Observatory
migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk › home › commentaries › q&a: the uk’s former policy to send asylum seekers to rwanda
Q&A: The UK’s former policy to send asylum seekers to Rwanda - Migration Observatory - The Migration Observatory
August 13, 2024 - This updated commentary answers some common questions about the Rwanda asylum policy and its implications, reflects the Labour government’s announcement that it is cancelling the Rwanda scheme, and to review the financial cost of the policy to date.
Discussions

Government scheme to send asylum seekers to Rwanda will cost £169,000 per person, Home Office says

🌐 r/unitedkingdom
352
June 26, 2023

£169,000 per person is absolutely fucking mental.

That is such an enormous amount of money - especially compared to the cost of processing asylum claims quickly and then giving refugees who have had their claims accepted short term support until they can start working and start supporting themsleves.

Right wingers claim to be worried about refugees stealing our jobs, but if the alternative is taxing us £169,000 so that they can spend the money on forcibly sending them to Rwanda against their will the it's difficult to believe that it's an economic choice.

It's all about the cruelty. They're prepared to tax us £169,000 or to take £169,000 away from schools, hospitals or schemes to support other needy people so that they can spend £169,000 on being cruel for absolutely no fucking reason.

If you still support this scheme, are you prepared to pay the extra tax so that you can be needlessly and expensively cruel to people who are fleeing war and persecution? Or do you expect the rest of us to chip in for this colossal waste of money as well?

More on reddit.com

Rwanda asylum scheme: Warning over rights record before UK flight

🌐 r/ukpolitics
89
87% Upvoted

This may possibly have been the most stupid policy ever proposed by the most stupid British government ever. For the following reasons:

  1. It's inhumane

  2. It's not economically viable (see similar attempt in Australia)

  3. There's no evidence that this deterrent system would work

  4. The agreement with Rwanda isn't actually one way - we would be taking some of their refugees in exchange (see paragraph 16 of the agreement). It would literally have no impact on net asylum seeker figures.

  5. It doesn't even attempt to target the problem - the fact that people smugglers are profiteering from this dangerous practice

  6. It can't attempt to tackle the problem identified in point 5 because it won't acknowledge the cause of this problem - the fact that alternative legal routes to claiming asylum have been closed down over the last decade. For the record, people weren't coming over in dinghys on this scale prior to 2010

  7. They knew the policy was never, ever going to happen. So it was a total waste of everyone's time, designed to create yet another distraction from the fact they've fucked everything

ETA - People down voting- tell me where I'm wrong?

More on reddit.com

Starmer opens the door to Albania immigration scheme to replace Rwanda - Prime Minister plans to discuss ‘strong migration options’ with Giorgia Meloni when they meet in Rome

🌐 r/ukpolitics
297
September 16, 2024
Whatever the pros and cons of this, it's clearly not the same as Rwanda so doesn't contradict Labour's position on that scheme. It would be for processing of asylum applications overseas and only allowing them into the to the UK if accepted. The Rwanda scheme was to send migrants who had their applications accepted there forever. More on reddit.com

Labour’s plan to turbocharge migrant returns after cancelling Rwanda scheme

🌐 r/ukpolitics
68
August 25, 2024
If Labour spends the entire Rwanda budget on actually deporting failed asylum seekers and foreign criminals who abused our hospitality by the 747 full, I'll be totally ok with it. More on reddit.com
🌐
House of Commons Library
commonslibrary.parliament.uk › house of commons library › research briefings › research briefing › uk-rwanda migration and economic development partnership
UK-Rwanda Migration and Economic Development Partnership - House of Commons Library
June 21, 2025 - The Supreme Court found in November 2023 that sending asylum seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. In response, the Government secured a new treaty with Rwanda and new legislation from Parliament, both designed to make the relocation scheme lawful.
🌐
USAPP
blogs.lse.ac.uk › politicsandpolicy › could-starmer-find-an-alternative-to-the-rwanda-plan
Could Starmer find an alternative to the Rwanda plan?
May 9, 2025 - The Scottish government’s independence referendum strategy: A last roll of the dice · People who trust scientists are more likely to get a COVID-19 vaccine. So what traits make scientists trustworthy · The 1972 ‘Papa India’ air disaster: what have we learned about supporting first ...
Find elsewhere
🌐
Oxford Law Blogs
blogs.law.ox.ac.uk › border-criminologies-blog › blog-post › 2025 › 02 › rwanda-scheme-dead-long-live-hostility
The Rwanda scheme is dead. Long live hostility! | Oxford Law Blogs
February 3, 2025 - Upon winning the July 2024 general elections, Prime Minister Keir Starmer confirmed that the Rwanda scheme was ‘dead and buried’. However, most spontaneous arrivals of asylum seekers and refugees at UK borders remain illegalised and liable to removal.
🌐
AP News
apnews.com › article › britain-uk-rwanda-plan-migrants-390ab706c755a1aa74fd6abed1230bc9
UK's scrapped Rwanda migrant plan a 'shocking waste' of $904 million in public funds, minister says | AP News
July 23, 2024 - Rwanda’s government has said it was not obligated to refund the money. “The previous government had planned to spend over 10 billion pounds of taxpayers money on the scheme, they did not tell Parliament that,” Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told lawmakers.
🌐
ODI
odi.org › en › insights › the-cost-of-the-uks-rwanda-plan-lessons-for-eu-member-states
The cost of the UK’s Rwanda plan: lessons for EU member states | ODI: Think change
June 18, 2024 - Thanks to the National Audit Office's ... paid to Rwanda. This is made up of large lump-sum payments into the fund (in April 2022, April 2023 and April 2024), plus a one-off £20m paid in April 2022 as an advance on operational costs. While £290m has been disbursed, not a single asylum seeker has been relocated under the scheme (though one ...
🌐
The Conversation
theconversation.com › is-the-rwanda-plan-acting-as-a-deterrent-heres-what-the-evidence-says-about-this-approach-228836
Is the Rwanda plan acting as a deterrent? Here’s what the evidence says about this approach
1 week ago - Estimates have emerged on the incredibly high costs of the Rwanda scheme to taxpayers, with the Home Office revealing that removing each asylum seeker to Rwanda will cost £63,000 more than keeping them in the UK.
🌐
IPPR
ippr.org › media-office › hidden-costs-of-rwanda-scheme-revealed-to-be-in-the-billions-finds-ippr
Hidden costs of Rwanda scheme revealed to be in the billions, finds IPPR | IPPR
March 18, 2024 - UK will have to pay up to around £230,000 per asylum seeker, compared to costs of £55,000 per person of pre-Rwanda system Rwanda payments for initial cohor
🌐
UK Parliament
hansard.parliament.uk › Commons › 2024-01-09 › debates › 57105D77-72DE-4246-9F6E-ED87FCB9A088 › RwandaPlanCostAndAsylumSystem
Rwanda Plan Cost and Asylum System - Hansard - UK Parliament
January 9, 2024 - I move the Humble Address to get some basic facts out of Government Ministers. Facts that, so far, they have been desperate to hide: facts about the Rwanda scheme; facts about the asylum backlog; and just basic facts about policies that the Government claim are their flagships but, in fact, ...
🌐
Human Rights Watch
hrw.org › news › 2023 › 11 › 15 › uk-supreme-court-finds-uk-rwanda-asylum-scheme-unlawful
UK Supreme Court Finds UK-Rwanda Asylum Scheme Unlawful | Human Rights Watch
November 15, 2023 - The United Kingdom’s highest court has found that Rwanda is not a safe third country for the government to send asylum seekers. This is a huge victory that will protect the rights of countless people who have come to the UK seeking safety.
🌐
UNHCR
unhcr.org › uk › what-we-do › unhcr-recommendations-uk-government › uk-rwanda-asylum-partnership
UK-Rwanda Asylum Partnership | UNHCR UK
The two governments subsequently signed the UK-Rwanda Asylum Partnership Treaty on 5 December 2023, and the UK Government published the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill on 6 December 2023. The Safety of Rwanda Act was passed into law by Parliament on 23 April 2024.
🌐
Institute for Government
instituteforgovernment.org.uk › explainer › government-rwanda-asylum-bill-treaty
What is in the government's new Rwanda asylum plan? | Institute for Government
December 7, 2023 - Prime minister Rishi Sunak has set out the details of his new plan to proceed with the Rwanda asylum scheme.
🌐
Indian Council of World Affairs
icwa.in › show_content.php
Offshore Asylum Processing: UK-Rwanda Plan - Indian Council of World Affairs (Government of India)
The UK Parliament passed on 22nd April 2024 the controversial UK-Rwanda Plan for which the Home Office has allegedly spent over £20m setting up the Rwanda scheme.[i] Irregular migration has become a recurring headline in UK politics, especially with the looming general election.
🌐
GOV.UK
gov.uk › home › entering and staying in the uk › border control › the safety of rwanda (asylum and immigration) bill: factsheets
Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill: factsheet - GOV.UK
April 25, 2024 - Rwanda has a strong history of providing protection to those that need it, and currently hosts over 135,000 refugees and asylum seekers who have found safety and sanctuary there. The UNHCR operates its own refugee scheme in Rwanda.