economic conflict since 2018
Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › China–United_States_trade_war
China–United States trade war - Wikipedia
2 weeks ago - About 8% of American solar panel imports in 2017 came from China. Imports of residential washing machines from China totaled about $1.1 billion in 2015. March 1: Trump announced tariffs of 25% on steel and 10% on aluminum imports from all countries. The United States had imported about 3% of ...
What was the status of tariffs by the US, EU and China BEFORE Trump's term? I would love specifics if possible but a general overview would also be nice.
The EU indeed has a 10% import tariff for cars: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/january/tradoc_152998.1%20Trade%20in%20goods%20and%20customs%20tariffs.pdf The same pdf notes that the US has a 14% import tariff on train carriages, and 350% on raw tobacco. Trump's trick is cherry-picking and creating outrage over specific products, completely ignoring that they are balanced by tariffs on other products. More on reddit.com
China imposes 34% reciprocal tariffs on imports of US goods in retaliation for Trump’s trade war
The Economist ran an op-ed about the mood in China at the moment. Contrary to most of the rest of the world the Chinese are elated. I think many Chinese believe this is the inflection point where the US starts to retreat into isolation and China cements its position as the major economic superpower for the 21st century. Well played Mr Trump. More on reddit.com
I'm confused: Did Canada/Mexico/China already have tariffs on imports from the US before their most recent retaliatory tariffs?
I can't speak to China, but regarding Canada and Mexico, I encourage you to read up on the USMCA , which governs the current status of free trade between Canada, Mexico, and the US. Long story short, the vast majority of goods produced within the borders of either of those three countries are exempt from any kind of tariffs. The exceptions are essentially that Canada imposes some tariffs on dairy products, poultry, and eggs, while the US imposes some tariffs on dairy products, sugar, and peanuts. I believe Mexico has no exceptions at all. The claims by Trump and his circle of liars that the 25% tariffs the US just imposed on Canada are, at least in part, a retaliation against existing tariffs levied by Canada on the US are nonsense. Most notably: Trump has claimed that the Canadian Goods and Services Tax (GST), which is a federally implemented sales tax, is a tariff on US goods. This is nonsense, because it's only true if you don't care about the meaning of the word "tariff". The GST is like any other sales tax, in that it applies equally to all goods, regardless of origin, and therefore in no way disadvantages US goods (or any other countries' goods) relative to Canadian ones. Thus, it is not a tariff by any standard definition of the word. Further, almost all US states have a state sales tax of some kind. Are those also tariffs? No, obviously not. Trump has also claimed that the Canadian Digital Services Tax (DST) is a tariff on US goods. This is a 3% tax on certain revenues of large companies coming from engagement with online users in Canada. This tax applies to all companies that meet a certain size threshold, regardless of their home country. So, again, this tax is not a tariff by any standard definition of the word. That said, it's likely true that many of the firms that meet the size threshold are American by virtue of the fact that large tech firms are mostly American. Even if that's true, the idea that a 3% tax on a very small subset of US firms justifies a retaliatory blanket 25% tax on all Canadian goods is obviously absurd, especially given that this is something that could easily be addressed in the impending re-negotiation of the USMCA. More on reddit.com
Why only 10% tariffs on China?
Because he wants to create a highly inflationary market so his billionaire class can continue their money grab from the poor. He's artificially creating the same scarcity he did during Covid. Either that or he's a moron. More on reddit.com
WITS
wits.worldbank.org › CountryProfile › en › Country › CHN › Year › 2015 › Summarytext
China Trade Summary 2015 | WITS | Text - World Bank
China Capital goods imports were worth US$ 706,725 million, product share of 42.08%. ... The maximum rate of tariff in percentage on any product was 3,000 percent.
WITS
wits.worldbank.org › CountryProfile › en › Country › USA › Year › 2015 › Summarytext
United States Trade Summary 2015 | WITS | Text
Merchandise Trade summary statistics for United States (USA) including exports and imports, applied tariffs, top export and import by partner countries and top exported/imported product groups, along with development indicators from WDI such as GDP, GNI per capita, trade balance and trade as ...
Congress.gov
congress.gov › crs-product › IF12990
U.S.-China Tariff Actions Since 2018: An Overview | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
1 month ago - Some actions explicitly target China; others involve sectors that affect China (Figure 1). China has responded to U.S. tariffs with its own tariffs and market restrictions. Given the trade imbalance (China exports to the United States more than four times what it imports), China has fewer goods on which to raise tariffs.
MacroTrends
macrotrends.net › global-metrics › countries › chn › china › tariff-rates
China Tariff Rates | Historical Chart & Data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International ...
Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Tariffs_in_the_first_Trump_administration
Tariffs in the first Trump administration - Wikipedia
2 weeks ago - The value of the Canadian tariffs were set to match the value of the U.S. tariffs dollar-for-dollar and cover 299 U.S. goods, including steel, aluminum, and a variety of other products, including inflatable boats, yogurt, whiskies, candles, and sleeping bags before the tariffs were lifted on May 20, 2019. The Chinese government placed retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods. China threatened to curb imports of U.S. soybeans. A June 2019 analysis conducted by the Peterson Institute for International Economics found that China had imposed the same 8% average tariffs on all countries in January 2018, but by June 2019 average tariffs on American exports had increased to 20.7% while those on other countries had declined to 6.7%
ScienceDirect
sciencedirect.com › science › article › abs › pii › S0022199625000224
Trade war and peace: U.S.-China trade and tariff risk from 2015–2050 - ScienceDirect
March 10, 2025 - This paper reveals that the reduction in the US-China trade deficit during the trade war obscured reporting discrepancies in US imports of Chinese products due to tariff evasion. We empirically examine the effect of the US-China trade war on tariff evasion in US imports of Chinese goods and provide direct evidence that market demand of entry states contributes significantly to tariff evasion.
Reddit
reddit.com › r/geopolitics › what was the status of tariffs by the us, eu and china before trump's term? i would love specifics if possible but a general overview would also be nice.
r/geopolitics on Reddit: What was the status of tariffs by the US, EU and China BEFORE Trump's term? I would love specifics if possible but a general overview would also be nice.
July 13, 2018 -
Did China really have a 25% tariff and the EU a 10% tariff on foreign cars? I keep being surprised by these throwaway lines in news reports about Trump's latest threat and I've come to realize that I have no idea what the state of trade barriers were before all of this started.
I would love to get an idea of the bigger picture if anyone can provide one. And please leave out the commentary on Trump's proposals. That there has been no shortage of. What's missing is the before picture, not speculation on the after. Thanks.
Top answer 1 of 4
20
The EU indeed has a 10% import tariff for cars: http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/january/tradoc_152998.1%20Trade%20in%20goods%20and%20customs%20tariffs.pdf The same pdf notes that the US has a 14% import tariff on train carriages, and 350% on raw tobacco. Trump's trick is cherry-picking and creating outrage over specific products, completely ignoring that they are balanced by tariffs on other products.
2 of 4
4
You can search in minute detail on the World Integrated Trade Solution site.
NBER
nber.org › system › files › working_papers › w29315 › w29315.pdf pdf
NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE US-CHINA TRADE WAR
(2015) argue that flexibility concerns may overturn the · relationship between import market power and applied tariffs. 13See Costinot and Werning (2019) for a general treatment of Lerner’s symmetry. ... challenging. Tariffs affect the prices of highly disaggregated imported transactions, with a change · in one tariffpotentially affecting the import prices of several goods as demand is reallocated and
Economic Policy Institute
epi.org › publication › growth-in-u-s-china-trade-deficit-between-2001-and-2015-cost-3-4-million-jobs-heres-how-to-rebalance-trade-and-rebuild-american-manufacturing
Growth in U.S.–China trade deficit between 2001 and 2015 cost 3.4 million jobs: Here’s how to rebalance trade and rebuild American manufacturing
January 31, 2017 - If exports to China had increased at this pace, it would have supported the creation of millions of U.S. manufacturing jobs, and prevented much of the collapse of overall U.S. manufacturing employment between 2001 and 2015, when 3.4 million U.S. manufacturing jobs were lost (BLS 2016c). This level of growth in U.S. exports to China could not have taken place without major, structural changes in China’s trade, industrial, macroeconomic, and labor policies. This analysis does illustrate the potential gains had China trade delivered on the promises made by China trade proponents when China entered the WTO in 2001. Growing U.S. trade deficits with China have reduced demand for goods produced in every region of the United States and led to job displacement in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, as shown in Table 4 and Figure B.
NBC News
nbcnews.com › world › asia › china-emerges-big-winner-supreme-courts-tariff-ruling-rcna260382
China emerges as big winner from Supreme Court's tariff ruling
Those who stand to lose the most include Japan and Taiwan, both of which had previously pledged hundreds of billions in U.S. investment in exchange for a tariff rate of 15%. Singapore and Australia also stand to lose since they already had a relatively favorable tariff rate of 10%. “If you’re Taiwan, you’re like, why on earth did I commit to $250 billion if I’m getting the same tariffs?” said García-Herrero, who is based in Hong Kong. The Trump administration has said that it will stand by existing deals and that it expects U.S. trading partners to do so as well. “The good news is that almost all countries and corporations want to keep the deal that they already made,” Trump said Tuesday in his State of the Union address, “knowing that the legal power that I as president have to make a new deal could be far worse for them.” ... A day earlier, Trump said in a social media post that any countries that tried to “play games” with trade deals after the court ruling would be hit with much hi
Published 3 weeks ago