June 23, 2025 - One difficulty, Boasberg told students, is that the January 6th trials are operating in an area with “a lot of law still to be made.” Matching the defendants’ alleged crimes to statutes is one challenge; as Judge Boasberg pointed out, “there were no statutes that were written that said, ‘it is a criminal offense to storm the capital and interfere with the counting of certification of the electoral college after the presidential election’… No one could fathom something like this.” · Boasberg said the charges have not always fit the conduct; some defendants, for instance, have pled to the misdemeanor of “parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a capitol building,” which was meant to cover people yelling and disrupting Congress, not for the crime of storming the Capitol. He predicted that many questions of criminal law in these cases will end up being decided by the US Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court, such as determining what obstruction, corruption, and conspiracy means in this co

2 weeks ago - The appeals court seemed to favor giving U.S. District Judge James Boasberg more leeway to continue probing whether officials flouted his orders when they deported hundreds of Venezuelans to El Salvador. Then Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem takes questions from the press on March 26, 2025. in San Salvador, El Salvador. | Alex Brandon/Getty Images ... A federal appeals court appears likely to allow a contempt investigation, which could include criminal charges, to proceed against Trump administration officials. All but one of the 11 active judges on the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals were on hand Tuesday for a nearly three-hour argument over the Justice Department’s bid to shut down contempt proceedings initiated last year by U.S. District Judge James Boasberg. He launched the probe after the administration deported hundreds of Venezuelans to El Salvador despite an order from Boasberg that appeared to require that many of the men be kept in U.S.

November 2, 2025 - The judge’s comments came during a lecture titled “The U.S. District Court in the Shadow of January 6th,” where he reflected on sentencing J6ers. According to reports, he told students that the unprecedented nature of the event left prosecutors scrambling to match defendants’ actions to existing statutes, noting, “There were no statutes that were written that said, ‘it is a criminal offense to storm the Capitol and interfere with the counting of certification of the electoral college after the presidential election.’” · Boasberg said “a lot of law still to be made” in this area, calling for legislative action to create harsher penalties tailored to January 6 defendants.

September 2, 2026 - On December 22, 2025, Boasberg ... by January 5, 2026. American Oversight v. Hegseth is a pending lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The case, submitted by watchdog group American Oversight, concerns allegations that officials in the Trump administration unlawfully used the encrypted Signal messaging app to discuss sensitive military operations, in violation of federal record-keeping laws. Chief Judge James Boasberg was randomly ...

March 26, 2025 - The account revealed, “🚨🇺🇸ACTIVIST JUDGE BOASBERG CLAIMED J6 DEFENDANTS DESERVED HARSHER CHARGES — CALLED FOR “NEW LAWS” TO PUNISH THEM. In a shocking 2023 speech to law students, Judge James Boasberg — who ruled over many January 6th cases — openly admitted the law wasn’t harsh enough to punish defendants the way he wanted.”

Boasberg also mentioned that in his district, where cases are randomly assigned to a cohort of around 20 judges, each judge ended up with approximately 65 defendants over whose cases to preside.

April 14, 2026 - Judge Boasberg’s ruling on Ray Epps is also questionable. Likely federal operative Ray Epps received 1-year probation and a $500 fine for his role on January 6th 2021, a marked difference from the many other J6 defendants.

See posts, photos and more on Facebook

January 20, 2026 - Washington, D.C. – Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Courts Subcommittee, has alerted House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) to inaccuracies in a January 7 letter he received from Senate Judiciary Courts Subcommittee Chairman Ted Cruz (R-TX) regarding the potential impeachment of Chief Judge James Boasberg. Chairman Cruz also held a hearing that day amplifying calls for Chief Judge Boasberg’s impeachment. Whitehouse clarified the facts in a letter issued to Speaker Johnson on Thursday. Chief Judge Boasberg, a distinguished federal district court judge in the District of Columbia, has found the Trump administration in violation of federal law in several high-profile cases and has been the target of a barrage of threats by the MAGA movement and the Trump administration. These threats appear intended to intimidate Chief Judge Boasberg and prevent him from examining potential contempt of court by the MAGA Department of Justice and are part of a larger coo

November 6, 2023 - Boasberg also mentioned that in his district, where cases are randomly assigned to a cohort of around 20 judges, each judge ended up with approximately 65 defendants over whose cases to preside.

November 22, 2024 - On Friday, Chief Judge James Boasberg reduced the prison sentence for U.S. Capitol rioter Marc Bru by one year, despite the defendant's repeated disruptive courtroom conduct, which included berating the judge.

December 4, 2025 - Cynthia Ballenger and her husband, Christopher Price, were both tried and convicted on misdemeanor charges related to the so-called “insurrection” at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, and ordered to pay hundreds of dollars in restitution ...

April 18, 2026 - One judicial turnabout deserves another in Washington, D.C., where refunds for pardoned January 6 defendants are currently in vogue.

July 1, 2025 - "The court need not embark on a ... Boasberg explained Monday in a brief two-page order to defendants Cynthia Ballenger and her husband Christopher Price....

January 18, 2023 - (Boasberg’s political affiliation may require an asterisk. Before joining the federal bench, he served on the D.C. Superior Court as a President George W. Bush appointee.) That unanimity is resounding, impressive and heartening. Also encouraging is the judges’ performance on another politically sensitive issue—though here the situation is not as open and shut. A number of Jan. 6 defendants have raised “selective prosecution” claims, alleging that the Democratic administration, because of political bias, is treating Capitol rioters more harshly than “similarly situated” rioters who staged violent protests outside the U.S.

A federal judge on Friday quashed Justice Department subpoenas issued to the Federal Reserve in January, a severe blow to an investigation that has already attracted strong criticism on Capitol Hill. ... A federal appeals court judge has dismissed a misconduct complaint filed by the Justice Department against a judge who clashed with President Donald Trump ’s administration over deportations to a notorious prison in El Salvador. ... The decision from a divided three-judge panel based in the nation’s capital vacates a finding from U.S District Judge James E. Boasberg. ... The move by U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg marks an escalation in a battle between the judicial and executives branches of government over a president’s powers to carry out key White House priorities. ... Displeased with the check on Trump’s power, the president and his allies have lashed out at federal ...

February 2, 2026 - The complaint against U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg was dismissed on Dec. 19 by Jeffrey S. Sutton, chief judge of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals but the order only came to light over the weekend. The complaint stemmed from remarks that Boasberg, the chief judge in the district court in the nation’s capital, allegedly made in March 2025 to Chief Justice John Roberts and other federal judges at a judicial conference saying the administration would trigger a constitutional crisis by disregarding federal court rulings. The meeting took place days before Boasberg issued an order blocking deportation flights that Trump was carrying out by invoking wartime authorities from an 18th century law. In the dismissal order, Sutton said the Justice Department never provided a listed attachment to provide proof of what Boasberg said or the context of the alleged statement at the closed-door conference.

December 13, 2025 - Article argues Chief D.C. U.S. District Judge James Boasberg should face impeachment for alleged judicial misconduct and partisan rulings against Trump administration.