June 23, 2025 - One difficulty, Boasberg told students, is that the January 6th trials are operating in an area with “a lot of law still to be made.” Matching the defendants’ alleged crimes to statutes is one challenge; as Judge Boasberg pointed out, “there were no statutes that were written that said, ‘it is a criminal offense to storm the capital and interfere with the counting of certification of the electoral college after the presidential election’… No one could fathom something like this.” · Boasberg said the charges have not always fit the conduct; some defendants, for instance, have pled to the misdemeanor of “parading, demonstrating, or picketing in a capitol building,” which was meant to cover people yelling and disrupting Congress, not for the crime of storming the Capitol. He predicted that many questions of criminal law in these cases will end up being decided by the US Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court, such as determining what obstruction, corruption, and conspiracy means in this co

November 6, 2023 - Boasberg emphasized that the critical questions that emerged were about the number of individuals to be charged and the specific criteria for determining who would be included. Forman then asked about the challenges the storming posed in terms of making judgments when there were no legal precedents to bring to bear. “Prosecutors often, like other people in our system, reason with precedent,” Forman said. “But, there is no precedent here.” · Boasberg clarified that, unlike a murder case, which has statutes that are clearly applicable, the unique circumstances surrounding the Capitol storming lacked applicable statutes. According to Boasberg, Congress had not anticipated a scenario where thousands of people would storm the Capitol, leaving prosecutors in a challenging position to determine the appropriate charges for those involved. However, Boasberg said that some of the charges that they landed on were assaulting a federal officer and sedition, which is the crime of creating a revolt.

November 2, 2025 - Sandra Weyer, a 60-year-old Pennsylvania woman who committed no violent acts on January 6, was sentenced to 14 months in federal prison by Boasberg on a charge of “obstructing an official proceeding” under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2), a corporate ...

March 22, 2025 - He’s great to practice in front of, because he follows the law and the rules.” · One January 6 defendant, Jonathan Munafo, who pleaded guilty to assaulting police, publicly said he expected a “Boasberg discount” at sentencing, because ...

December 4, 2025 - Cynthia Ballenger and her husband, Christopher Price, were both tried and convicted on misdemeanor charges related to the so-called “insurrection” at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, and ordered to pay hundreds of dollars in restitution ...

We cannot provide a description for this page right now

July 1, 2025 - "The court need not embark on a ... Boasberg explained Monday in a brief two-page order to defendants Cynthia Ballenger and her husband Christopher Price....

April 18, 2026 - This time, Boasberg was convinced. In December 2025, the court granted the motion and said the "United States shall refund Defendants Ballenger and Price $570 each."

March 26, 2025 - In a reply to that post, another user posted evidence of Boasberg’s bias. The account revealed, “🚨🇺🇸ACTIVIST JUDGE BOASBERG CLAIMED J6 DEFENDANTS DESERVED HARSHER CHARGES — CALLED FOR “NEW LAWS” TO PUNISH THEM.

1 month ago - On December 22, 2025, Boasberg ... by January 5, 2026. American Oversight v. Hegseth is a pending lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The case, submitted by watchdog group American Oversight, concerns allegations that officials in the Trump administration unlawfully used the encrypted Signal messaging app to discuss sensitive military operations, in violation of federal record-keeping laws. Chief Judge James Boasberg was randomly ...

November 22, 2024 - On Friday, Chief Judge James Boasberg reduced the prison sentence for U.S. Capitol rioter Marc Bru by one year, despite the defendant's repeated disruptive courtroom conduct, which included berating the judge.

The declaration comes as U.S. District Judge James Boasberg weighs whether the government defied his order to turn around planes carrying migrants after he blocked deportations of people alleged to be gang members without due process. ... Trump administration invokes state secrets privilege in case over deportation of Venezuelan migrants · By Michael Kunzelman, Lindsay Whitehurst, Associated Press · Government attorneys also asked an appeals court Monday to lift the order and allow deportations to continue, a push that appeared to divide the judges. ... Federal Judge James Boasberg granted the administration additional time as he determines whether it ignored his order regarding deportation flights over the weekend. President Trump called Boasberg a ‘radical left’ judge and has escalated his criticism of the federal judiciary. ... Despite a rare rebuke from Chief Justice John Roberts earlier this week, President Trump's criticisms of the judiciary continue.

January 18, 2023 - (Boasberg’s political affiliation may require an asterisk. Before joining the federal bench, he served on the D.C. Superior Court as a President George W. Bush appointee.) That unanimity is resounding, impressive and heartening. Also encouraging is the judges’ performance on another politically sensitive issue—though here the situation is not as open and shut. A number of Jan. 6 defendants have raised “selective prosecution” claims, alleging that the Democratic administration, because of political bias, is treating Capitol rioters more harshly than “similarly situated” rioters who staged violent protests outside the U.S.

February 12, 2025 - "That right of access does not dissipate merely because all of the Capitol Case defendants have been pardoned. To the contrary, the public interest in ensuring that the Video Exhibits remain available in the future is all the greater, given that these videos are immutable and represent the truth, no matter how the events of January 6 are described by those charged or their allies." The Trump administration had not responded to Boasberg's request as of Wednesday afternoon, according to court records.

The judge, James Boasberg, said that there was “probable cause” the administration had violated an order he gave last month to keep the migrants in the U.S., instead of sending them to El Salvador. The move toward a possible inquiry was a remarkable attempt by a judge to hold the White House accountable for its apparent willingness to flout court orders. Read the ruling here. What’s next: Boasberg said that if the White House did not comply, he would order sworn declarations from officials to find who was responsible. If that effort failed, he said he would require depositions or hold hearings under oath. And if that technique was unsuccessful, Boasberg said he would refer the case to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution. ... H.Res.229 - Impeaching James E. Boasberg, United States District Court Chief Judge for the District of Columbia, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

April 2, 2025 - “There is a strong argument that anybody who was there that day deserves jail,” Boasberg told Gary Edwards, a 68-year-old with no criminal record, before sentencing him to probation and a fine.

December 13, 2025 - There was also a serious risk to the personnel on the planes, given that they had a limited fuel supply and were in the middle of the Gulf of America. Boasberg showed a blatant disregard for these serious risks in issuing a highly illegal and dangerous order that he lacked jurisdiction to give. ... The planes landed in El Salvador, and Boasberg began contempt proceedings. Even after a D.C. Circuit panel rejected his reasoning, Boasberg pressed ahead, ordering the administration to detail its deliberations that March day. The Justice Department is objecting, asserting that Boasberg is violating the foundational principle of separation of powers by having executive branch officials illegally divulge privileged internal discussions. Then-Special Counsel Jack Smith delivers remarks on an unsealed indictment including four felony counts against former President Donald Trump Aug.

March 18, 2025 - Here are 4 things to know about Judge Boasberg Judge Boasberg's role overseeing a new case that challenges the deportation of alleged Venezuelan gang members to El Salvador has cast an even brighter light on the longtime judge. ... James Boasberg shown here on Monday, March 13, 2023. Valerie Plesch/Bloomberg via Getty Images hide caption toggle caption Valerie Plesch/Bloomberg via Getty Images · Judge James "Jeb" Boasberg's time leading the federal trial court in Washington, D.C., had already proved memorable before last weekend. But his role overseeing a new case that challenges the deportation of hundreds of alleged Venezuelan gang members to El Salvador has cast an even brighter light on the longtime judge and his work. Boasberg has demanded answers from the Justice Department about whether it followed his orders, and if not, why. For his part, President Trump posted on social media Tuesday that Boasberg should be impeached for acting as a check on executive branch authority.